Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2012:2012:851740.
doi: 10.1155/2012/851740. Epub 2012 Dec 25.

Effects of immediate orthodontic and orthopedic forces on peri-miniscrew bones: histomorphologic and histomorphometric assessment in dogs

Affiliations

Effects of immediate orthodontic and orthopedic forces on peri-miniscrew bones: histomorphologic and histomorphometric assessment in dogs

Mansour Rismanchian et al. Int J Dent. 2012.

Abstract

Aim. The aim of this study was histomorphologic and histomorphometric evaluation of peri-screw bone after immediate orthodontic and orthopedic forces and comparing them with a control group. Materials and Methods. 18 dual-top miniscrews were inserted in the premolar region of three Iranian dogs. Screws were divided into three groups: (1) the first group undergoing immediate orthodontic force of 300 cN, (2) the second group undergoing immediate orthopedic force of 600 cN and (3) a control group. Screws were explanted with adequate amount of surrounding bone after three months. Bone-screw contact (BSC), percentage of lamellar bone, and percentage of woven bone were evaluated. Wilcoxon and Man Whitney tests were used to analyze the data using SPSS software ver. 15 (α = 0.05). Results. There was no significant difference among the groups in terms of bone-screw contact (P value = 0.42), percentage of lamellar bone (P value = 0.83), and percentage of woven bone (P value = 0.88). Conclusion. By applying orthodontic and orthopedic forces to mini-screws the quality of surrounding bone and osseointegration will not be affected. Clinical Significance. Application of force to mini-screws is helpful in orthodontic-screw therapies.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Schematic scheme of miniscrew sites. The distance between adjacent miniscrews is 20 mm. White circles stand for screws undergoing orthodontic force. Black circles stand for control screws. 300 cN was applied in maxilla (arrow A). 600 cN force was applied in mandible (arrow B).
Figure 2
Figure 2
Photomicrographs of bone-to-miniscrew contact in different groups: (a) immediate orthodontic group, (b) immediate orthopedic group, and (c) control group. Note the quality of bone formation (woven and lamellar) around screws. Masson's trichrome; original magnification ×100 (BSC: Bone-to-miniscrew contact, L.B: Lamellar bone, W.B: woven bone).

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Huang LH, Shotwell JL, Wang HL. Dental implants for orthodontic anchorage. American Journal of Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopedics. 2005;127(6):713–722. - PubMed
    1. Graber TM, Vanarsdall RL. Orthodontics: current Principles and Techniques. Rio de Janeiro, Brazil edition. Guanabara Koogan: 1999.
    1. Melsen B, Petersen JK, Costa A. Zygoma ligatures: an alternative form of maxillary anchorage. Journal of Clinical Orthodontics. 1998;32(3):154–158. - PubMed
    1. Roberts WE, Smith RK, Zilberman Y, Mozsary PG, Smith RS. Osseous adaptation to continuous loading of rigid endosseous implants. American Journal of Orthodontics. 1984;86(2):95–111. - PubMed
    1. Wehrbein H, Merz BR, Diedrich P, Glatzmaier J. The use of palatal implants for orthodontic anchorage: design and clinical application of the orthosystem. Clinical Oral Implants Research. 1996;7(2):410–416. - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources