Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2013 Feb 5;108(2):395-401.
doi: 10.1038/bjc.2012.572. Epub 2013 Jan 15.

REG Iα is a biomarker for predicting response to chemotherapy with S-1 plus cisplatin in patients with unresectable stage IV gastric cancer

Affiliations

REG Iα is a biomarker for predicting response to chemotherapy with S-1 plus cisplatin in patients with unresectable stage IV gastric cancer

A Sekikawa et al. Br J Cancer. .

Abstract

Background: The regenerating gene Iα (REG Iα) is involved in gastric carcinogenesis as an antiapoptotic factor. Therefore, we investigated whether REG Iα confers resistance to chemotherapeutic drugs in gastric cancer (GC) cells and whether REG Iα expression is useful for predicting the response to chemotherapy and outcome in patients with GC.

Methods: A total of 70 patients with unresectable stage IV GC received first-line chemotherapy with S-1 and cisplatin (S-1/CDDP). The expression of REG Iα was evaluated immunohistochemically using biopsy samples obtained before chemotherapy, and its relationship to clinicopathological parameters was analysed statistically. The effects of REG Iα gene induction on resistance to 5-FU or CDDP treatment were examined by cell survival assay and flow cytometry.

Results: Of the 70 patients with unresectable stage IV GC, 19 (27%) were positive for REG Iα expression. The expression of REG Iα was independently predictive of poorer progression-free and overall survival in such patients (hazard ratio (HR) 2.46; P=0.002 and HR 1.89; P=0.037, respectively). The gene induction of REG Iα conferred resistance to cell death induced by 5-FU or CDDP in GC cells.

Conclusion: In patients with stage IV GC, REG Iα, which confers resistance to chemotherapeutic drugs in GC cells, is a potential biomarker for predicting resistance to S-1/CDDP treatment.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Immunostaining of REG Iα in biopsy samples obtained from gastric cancer tissues. The biopsy samples were obtained before chemotherapy (A, B, and D) and after disease progression (C). (A) The REG Iα-negative gastric cancer (diffuse type). (B) The REG Iα-positive gastric cancer (intestinal type). (C) The REG Iα-positive gastric cancer (diffuse type). This sample was obtained from the same patient as that in (A) when he developed disease progression after S-1/CDDP treatment. (D) The REG Iα-positive signet-ring cell carcinoma (diffuse type).
Figure 2
Figure 2
(A) Progression-free survival (PFS) and (B) overall survival (OS) according to REG Iα expression in patients with unresectable stage IV GC who received first-line treatment with S-1/CDDP. Kaplan–Meier curves were constructed and pairwise differences were analysed by log-rank test.
Figure 3
Figure 3
Effects of REG Iα gene induction on resistance to anticancer drugs in gastric cancer cells. Human gastric cancer AGS cells stably transfected with pIRES2-hREG Iα (AGS-REG Iα) or pIRES2-EGFP (AGS-EGFP; control) plasmid were treated with 5-FU (A, 0.2–20 mℳ) or CDDP (B, 1–100 μℳ) for 30 h. The percentage of viable cells was then evaluated, as described in Materials and Methods. All results are expressed as the means±s.e.m. of four samples. *P<0.001 vs AGS-EGFP at the same dose point.
Figure 4
Figure 4
Effects of REG Iα gene induction on cell death induced by anticancer drugs in gastric cancer cells. The AGS-REG Iα or AGS-EGFP cells were treated with 5-FU (A and B, 20 mℳ) or CDDP (C and D, 100 μℳ) for 24 h. The cells were then stained using propidium iodide and analysed by flow cytometry to evaluate the percentage of dead cells, as described in Materials and Methods. All results are expressed as the means±s.e.m. of four samples.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Boku N. Chemotherapy for metastatic gastric cancer in Japan. Int J Oncol. 2008;13:483–487. - PubMed
    1. Chau I, Norman AR, Cunningham D, Waters JS, Oates J, Ross PJ. Multivariate prognostic factor analysis in locally advanced and metastatic esophago-gastric cancer-pooled analysis from three multicenter, randomized, controlled trials using individual patient data. J Clin Oncol. 2004;22:2395–2403. - PubMed
    1. Choi IS, Lee HS, Lee KW, Kim H, Kim KH, Kim YJ, Kim JH, Kim WH, Lee JS. Biomarker analysis in patients with advanced gastric cancer treated with S-1 plus cisplatin chemotherapy: orotate phosphoribosyltransferase expression is associated with treatment outcomes. Med Oncol. 2011;28:991–998. - PubMed
    1. Dhar DK, Udagawa J, Ishihara S, Otani H, Kinoshita Y, Takasawa S, Okamoto H, Kubota H, Fujii T, Tachibana M, Nagasue N. Expression of regenerating gene I in gastric cancer adenocarcinomas. Cancer. 2004;100:1130–1136. - PubMed
    1. Ferlay J, Shin HR, Bray F, Forman D, Mathers C, Parkin DM. Estimates of worldwide burden of cancer in 2008: GLOBOCAN 2008. Int J Cancer. 2010;127:2893–2917. - PubMed

Publication types

MeSH terms