Abortion policy and women's health in developing countries
- PMID: 2332264
- DOI: 10.2190/V08N-UE7N-TNBH-RA4P
Abortion policy and women's health in developing countries
Abstract
The World Health Organization estimates that almost half a million women in developing countries die in pregnancy and childbirth every year. Unsafe induced abortion is responsible for perhaps one-quarter of these deaths. In this article, the author reviews the legal, medical, and social contexts in which women in developing countries resort to clandestine abortion. Despite intensified international concern with reducing high rates of maternal mortality and morbidity, national policy makers and participants at international conferences on maternal health--with a few important exceptions--have not recommended that safe, legal services for terminating unwanted pregnancies be offered as an essential element of basic reproductive health care. United States international policy on funding abortion-related activities in maternal health and family planning programs is especially restrictive. A new policy approach is clearly needed if unacceptably high rates of maternal morbidity and mortality in many countries are to be reduced.
PIP: Unsafe clandestine abortion is responsible for an estimated 100-200,000 deaths among women in developing countries each year and accounts for 25-50% of all maternal deaths in some regions, especially Latin America. A third of the population of the Third World lives in countries where abortion is illegal or permitted only in extreme cases. Mortality from clandestine abortions in developing countries may be as high as 400/100,000 procedures compared with 6/200,000 in situations where abortion is legal. Even when women survive the procedure, there are numerous possible physical complications (incomplete abortion, pelvic infection, hemorrhage, shock, and secondary sterility), emotional sequelae, and enormous costs to the health care system for treating abortion complications. Given professed concern with improving maternal health, the refusal of so many governments to liberalize their abortion laws seems inconsistent. Even international conferences on maternal health generally refrain from issuing recommendations that safe, legal services for terminating unwanted pregnancies be offered as an integral part of national primary health care systems. Countries that have passed liberal abortion laws are reluctant to require all health care facilities to perform abortions. The US Government's decision to refuse to fund family planning programs that include abortion represents a major setback to women's reproductive rights and has forced many private voluntary organizations in the Third World to choose between continuing to provide safe, legal abortion and losing their funding. Since family planning has been defined as a basic human right in international documents, there is an urgent need for governments and medical institutions to examine the legal, medial, and ethical principles upon which they base their restrictive, discriminatory abortion policies.
Similar articles
-
Abortion, reproductive rights and maternal mortality.Focus Gend. 1994 Jun;2(2):45-50. doi: 10.1080/09682869308520025. Focus Gend. 1994. PMID: 12345532
-
Abortion and fertility regulation.Lancet. 1996 Jun 15;347(9016):1663-8. doi: 10.1016/s0140-6736(96)91491-9. Lancet. 1996. PMID: 8642962 Review.
-
Choice at any cost.World Watch. 1988 Mar-Apr;1(2):30-8. World Watch. 1988. PMID: 12281497
-
Effect of the Human Genome Initiative on women's rights and reproductive decisions.Fetal Diagn Ther. 1993 Apr;8(Suppl. 1):148-59. doi: 10.1159/000263882. Fetal Diagn Ther. 1993. PMID: 11653014
-
Unwanted pregnancy--medical and ethical dimensions.Med J Malaysia. 2003 Mar;58 Suppl A:23-35. Med J Malaysia. 2003. PMID: 14556348 Review.
Cited by
-
The World Health Organization's safe abortion guidance document.Am J Public Health. 2013 Apr;103(4):593-6. doi: 10.2105/AJPH.2012.301204. Epub 2013 Feb 14. Am J Public Health. 2013. PMID: 23409886 Free PMC article.
-
Spatial distribution and determinants of abortion among reproductive age women in Ethiopia, evidence from Ethiopian Demographic and Health Survey 2016 data: Spatial and mixed-effect analysis.PLoS One. 2020 Jun 29;15(6):e0235382. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0235382. eCollection 2020. PLoS One. 2020. PMID: 32598398 Free PMC article.
-
Protocol for a scoping review of research on abortion in sub-Saharan Africa.PLoS One. 2021 Jul 15;16(7):e0254818. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0254818. eCollection 2021. PLoS One. 2021. PMID: 34264992 Free PMC article.
-
Exploring the utilization of postabortion care services and related factors among women at a tertiary health facility in Gulu, Northern Uganda.Womens Health (Lond). 2024 Jan-Dec;20:17455057241295896. doi: 10.1177/17455057241295896. Womens Health (Lond). 2024. PMID: 39555648 Free PMC article.
-
Medical society engagement in contentious policy reform: the Ethiopian Society for Obstetricians and Gynecologists (ESOG) and Ethiopia's 2005 reform of its Penal Code on abortion.Health Policy Plan. 2018 May 1;33(4):583-591. doi: 10.1093/heapol/czy019. Health Policy Plan. 2018. PMID: 29538641 Free PMC article.
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources