Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2012 Winter;45(4):853-7.
doi: 10.1901/jaba.2012.45-853.

Teaching self-control with qualitatively different reinforcers

Affiliations

Teaching self-control with qualitatively different reinforcers

Michael Passage et al. J Appl Behav Anal. 2012 Winter.

Abstract

This study examined the effectiveness of using qualitatively different reinforcers to teach self-control to an adolescent boy who had been diagnosed with an intellectual disability. First, he was instructed to engage in an activity without programmed reinforcement. Next, he was instructed to engage in the activity under a two-choice fixed-duration schedule of reinforcement. Finally, he was exposed to self-control training, during which the delay to a more preferred reinforcer was initially short and then increased incrementally relative to the delay to a less preferred reinforcer. Self-control training effectively increased time on task to earn the delayed reinforcer.

Keywords: delay discounting; intellectual disability; self-control training.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1.
Figure 1.
Duration of Stevie's task engagement during natural baseline (A), choice baseline (B1 and B2), and self-control training (C) conditions. The solid triangles indicate that the participant chose the delayed, more preferred reinforcer; the open triangles indicate that the participant chose the immediate, less preferred reinforcer; GEN = generalization probe.

References

    1. Ainslie G. W. Impulse control in pigeons. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior. (1974);21:485–489. doi:10.1901/jeab.1974.21-485. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Davison M, Nevin J. A. Stimuli, reinforcers, and behavior: An integration. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior. (1999);71:439–482. doi:10.1901/jeab.1999.71-439. - PMC - PubMed
    1. DeLeon I. G, Iwata B. A. Evaluation of a multiple-stimulus presentation format for assessing reinforcer preferences. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis. (1996);29:519–533. doi:10.1901/jaba.1996.29-519. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Dixon M. R, Falcomata T. S. Preference for progressive delays and concurrent physical therapy exercise in an adult with acquired brain injury. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis. (2004);37:101–105. doi:10.1901/jaba.2004.37-101. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Dixon M. R, Hayes L. J, Binder L. M, Manthley S, Sigman C, Zdanowski D. M. Using a self-control training procedure to increase appropriate behavior. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis. (1998);31:203–210. doi:10.1901/jaba.1998.31-203. - PMC - PubMed