Clinical decision making in renal pain management
- PMID: 23322949
- PMCID: PMC3545323
- DOI: 10.5455/aim.2012.20.19-21
Clinical decision making in renal pain management
Abstract
Objectives: To determine the optimal medication for the treatment of renal colic using evidence based medicine (EBM) parameters (RR, ARR, NNT, NNH, ARI, RRI).
Sample and methodology: During 2010, an ITT study was conducted on 400 outpatients of the Sarajevo University Clinical Center Urology Clinic in order to investigate renal colic pain relief drugs. Each group consisting of 100 patients was administered either Metamizol amp. i.v., or Diclofenac amp. i.m., or Butylscopolamine amp. i.v., while 100 patients belonged to the placebo group that was given distilled water (aqua redestilata). All patients completed visual analogue pain scale (VAPS) from 0 to 10 prior to and after the treatment.
Results: Using EBM parameters Diclofenac Na and Metamizol were shown to be the most efficient in the treatment of renal colic. In these two groups, relative risk (RR) was 21 and 8,5% respectively; Absolute Risk Reduction (ARR) was 74 and 86% respectively, and Number Needed to Treat (NNT) was 1 for both groups, while chi-squared (X2) test has shown that there is no statistically significant difference between these two drugs when it comes to their effect. In the Butylscopolamine group, RR was 81; ARR 18%, while NNT was 5. With respect to side effects, only in his group it was shown that Relative Risk Increase (RRI) was 84, ARI 83%, while Number Needed to Harm (NNH) was 2.
Conclusion: The most optimal medication for the treatment of renal colic according to EBM parameters is Diclofenac Na, followed by Metamizol. Butylscopolamine is not recommended for the treatment of renal colic.
Keywords: ARI; EBM; NNT; RR; management.; renal colic.
Similar articles
-
[Comparative efficiency study, safety and usage of tested drugs in patients with renal colic].Med Arh. 2006;60(6 Suppl 1):37-40. Med Arh. 2006. PMID: 18172978 Bosnian.
-
Comparison of cizolirtine citrate and metamizol sodium in the treatment of adult acute renal colic: a randomized, double-blind, clinical pilot study.Clin Ther. 2004 Jul;26(7):1061-72. doi: 10.1016/s0149-2918(04)90178-6. Clin Ther. 2004. PMID: 15336471 Clinical Trial.
-
Intravenous Morphine vs Intravenous Ketofol for Treating Renal Colic; a Randomized Controlled Trial.Emerg (Tehran). 2016 Nov;4(4):202-206. Emerg (Tehran). 2016. PMID: 27800541 Free PMC article.
-
A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis Comparing the Efficacy of Nonsteroidal Anti-inflammatory Drugs, Opioids, and Paracetamol in the Treatment of Acute Renal Colic.Eur Urol. 2018 Apr;73(4):583-595. doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2017.11.001. Epub 2017 Nov 22. Eur Urol. 2018. PMID: 29174580
-
[The number needed to treat (NNT) and the number needed to harm (NNH)].Med Monatsschr Pharm. 2015 Mar;38(3):103-6. Med Monatsschr Pharm. 2015. PMID: 26364396 Review. German.
Cited by
-
Pain Management in the Emergency Department: a Review Article on Options and Methods.Adv J Emerg Med. 2018 Jun 24;2(4):e45. doi: 10.22114/AJEM.v0i0.93. eCollection 2018 Fall. Adv J Emerg Med. 2018. PMID: 31172108 Free PMC article. Review.
References
-
- Marshall LS. Tanagho EA, McAninch JW. Smith’s General Urology. 16th. San Francisco: Lange Medical Book; 2004. Urinary Stone Disease.
-
- Van Laecke E, Oosterlinck W. Physiopathology of renal colic and the therapeutic consequences. Acta Urologica Belgica. 1994;62:15–18. - PubMed
-
- Heid F, Jage J. The treatment of pain in urology. BJU International. 2002;90:481–488. - PubMed
-
- Jamison RN, Gracely RH, et al. Comparative study of electronic vs. paper VAS ratings: A randomized, crossover trial using healthy volunteers. Pain. 2002;99:341–347. - PubMed
-
- Lorig KR, Sobel DS, et al. Effect of a Self-Management Program on Patients with Chronic Disease. Eff. Clin. Pract. 2001;4:256–262. - PubMed
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources