Cooperation between research institutions and journals on research integrity cases: guidance from the committee on publication ethics (cope)
- PMID: 23322968
- PMCID: PMC3541569
- DOI: 10.5455/aim.2012.20.136-140
Cooperation between research institutions and journals on research integrity cases: guidance from the committee on publication ethics (cope)
Abstract
Institutions and journals both have important duties relating to research and publication misconduct. Institutions are responsible for the conduct of their researchers and for encouraging a healthy research environment. Journals are responsible for the conduct of their editors, for safeguarding the research record, and for ensuring the reliability of everything they publish. It is therefore important for institutions and journals to communicate and collaborate effectively on cases relating to research integrity. To achieve this, we make the following recommendations. Institutions should: have a research integrity officer (or office) and publish their contact details prominently; inform journals about cases of proven misconduct that affect the reliability or attribution of work that they have published; respond to journals if they request information about issues, such as disputed authorship, misleading reporting, competing interests, or other factors, including honest errors, that could affect the reliability of published work; initiate inquiries into allegations of research misconduct or unacceptable publication practice raised by journals; have policies supporting responsible research conduct and systems in place for investigating suspected research misconduct.Journals should: publish the contact details of their editor-in-chief who should act as the point of contact for questions relating to research and publication integrity; inform institutions if they suspect misconduct by their researchers, and provide evidence to support these concerns; cooperate with investigations and respond to institutions' questions about misconduct allegations; be prepared to issue retractions or corrections (according to the COP E guidelines on retractions) when provided with findings of misconduct arising from investigations; have policies for responding to institutions and other organizations that investigate cases of research misconduct.
Keywords: publication ethics.; scientific journals.
Similar articles
-
Cooperation & Liaison between Universities & Editors (CLUE): recommendations on best practice.Res Integr Peer Rev. 2021 Apr 15;6(1):6. doi: 10.1186/s41073-021-00109-3. Res Integr Peer Rev. 2021. PMID: 33853690 Free PMC article.
-
Cooperation between research institutions and journals on research integrity cases: guidance from the Committee on Publication Ethics (COPE).Maturitas. 2012 Jun;72(2):165-9. doi: 10.1016/j.maturitas.2012.03.011. Epub 2012 Apr 26. Maturitas. 2012. PMID: 22541357
-
Cooperation between research institutions and journals on research integrity cases: Guidance from the committee on publication ethics.Saudi J Anaesth. 2012 Apr;6(2):155-60. doi: 10.4103/1658-354X.97030. Saudi J Anaesth. 2012. PMID: 22754443 Free PMC article.
-
A Review of the Scientific Misconduct Inquiry Process, Ankara Chamber of Medicine, Turkey.Sci Eng Ethics. 2017 Aug;23(4):1097-1112. doi: 10.1007/s11948-016-9824-8. Epub 2016 Nov 28. Sci Eng Ethics. 2017. PMID: 27896602 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Misconduct in medical research: whose responsibility?Intern Med J. 2003 Apr;33(4):186-91. doi: 10.1046/j.1445-5994.2003.00373.x. Intern Med J. 2003. PMID: 12680986 Review.
Cited by
-
Plagiarism and Its Effect on Pediatric Surgery Publications.J Indian Assoc Pediatr Surg. 2017 Oct-Dec;22(4):199-201. doi: 10.4103/0971-9261.214458. J Indian Assoc Pediatr Surg. 2017. PMID: 28974869 Free PMC article. No abstract available.
-
The Pursuit of Originality Makes Us All the Same!Contemp Clin Dent. 2019 Jan-Mar;10(1):1-2. doi: 10.4103/ccd.ccd_410_19. Contemp Clin Dent. 2019. PMID: 32015633 Free PMC article. No abstract available.
-
Cooperation & Liaison between Universities & Editors (CLUE): recommendations on best practice.Res Integr Peer Rev. 2021 Apr 15;6(1):6. doi: 10.1186/s41073-021-00109-3. Res Integr Peer Rev. 2021. PMID: 33853690 Free PMC article.
-
Why Has COPE Developed Guidelines for Cooperation Between Journals and Research Institutions?Mater Sociomed. 2012;24(3):140-1. doi: 10.5455/msm.2012.24.140-141. Mater Sociomed. 2012. PMID: 23678320 Free PMC article. No abstract available.
-
Plagiarism in Publications: All about Being Fair!Indian J Radiol Imaging. 2025 Jan 9;35(Suppl 1):S36-S45. doi: 10.1055/s-0044-1791745. eCollection 2025 Jan. Indian J Radiol Imaging. 2025. PMID: 39802707 Free PMC article.
References
-
- Wager E. Coping with scientific misconduct. BMJ. 2011;343:d6586. - PubMed
-
- Wager E. What do journal editors do when they suspect research misconduct? Medicine & Law. 2007;26:535–544. - PubMed
-
- Sox HC, Rennie D. Research misconduct, retraction, and cleansing the medical literature: lessons from the Poehlman case. Annals of Internal Medicine. 2006;144:609–613. - PubMed
-
- Wager E, Barbour V, Yentis S, Kleinert S on behalf of COPE Council. Retractions: Guidance from the Committee on Publication Ethics (COPE) http://publicationethics.org/files/u661/Retractions_COPE_gline_final_3_S... . - PubMed
-
- COPE code of conduct for journal editors. www.publicationethics.org/resources/code-conduct .
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources