Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2012 Sep;20(3):141-8.
doi: 10.5455/aim.2012.20.141-148.

Ethical aspects and dilemmas of preparing, writing and publishing of the scientific papers in the biomedical journals

Affiliations

Ethical aspects and dilemmas of preparing, writing and publishing of the scientific papers in the biomedical journals

Izet Masic. Acta Inform Med. 2012 Sep.

Abstract

Introduction: In this paper author discussed about preparing and submitting manuscripts - scientific, research, professional papers, reviews and case reports. Author described it from the Editor's perspective, and specially talked about ethical aspects of authorship, conflict of interest, copyright, plagiarism and duplicate publication from the point of view of his experiences as Editor-in-Chief of several biomedical journals and Chief of Task Force of European Federation of Medical Informatics journals and member of Task Force of European Cardiology Society journals. The scientific process relies on trust and credibility. The scientific community demands high ethical standards to conduct biomedical research and to publish scientific contents. During the last decade, disclosure of conflicts of interest (COI ), (also called competing loyalties, competing interests or dual commitments), has been considered as a key element to guarantee the credibility of the scientific process. Biases in design, analysis and interpretation of studies may arise when authors or sponsors have vested interests. Therefore, COI should be made clear to the readers to facilitate their own judgment and interpretation of their relevance and potential implications.

Results and discussion: Authors are responsible to fully disclose potential COI . In October 2009 the ICMJE proposed an electronic "uniform" format for COI disclosure. Four main areas were addressed: authors´ associations with entities that supported the submitted manuscript (indefinite time frame), associations with commercial entities with potential interest in the general area of the manuscript (time frame 36 months), financial association of their spouse and children and, finally, non-financial associations potentially relevant to the submitted manuscript. Consumers of medical scholarship expect a reliable system of disclosure in which journals and authors make disclosures appropriately and consistently. There is a stigma surrounding the reporting of COI that should be progressively overcome. Further actions are required to increase awareness of the importance of COI disclosure and to promote policies aimed to enhance transparency in biomedical research. In this article author discuss about important ethical dilemmas in preparing, writing and publishing of scientific manuscripts in biomedical journals.

Keywords: acknowledgement; authorship; biomedical journals; conflict of interest; copyright; duplicate publication.; ethics; medical science; plagiarism.

PubMed Disclaimer

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Masic I. How to Search, Write, Prepare and Publish the Scientific Papers in the Biomedical Journals. Acta Inform Med. 2011;19(2):68–79. doi: 10.4555/aim.2011.19.68-79. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Gasparyan YA, Ayvazyan L, Kitas DG. Biomedical journal editing: elements of success. CMJ. 2011;52:423–428. doi: 103325/cmj.2011.52.423. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Marusic A. Importance of Ethical Publishing in Developing Countries. Acta Inform Med. 2012;20(1):4. doi: 105455/aim.2012.20.4-4. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Marusic A. Problems of editors with authorship in small medical journals. The International Journal of Occupational and Environmental Medicine. 2011;2(3):130–132. - PubMed
    1. O’Dowd A. Peer review system needs thorough evaluation. MPs hear. BMJ. 2011;342:d3046. doi: 10.1136/bmj.d3046.

LinkOut - more resources