Ethical aspects and dilemmas of preparing, writing and publishing of the scientific papers in the biomedical journals
- PMID: 23322969
- PMCID: PMC3508847
- DOI: 10.5455/aim.2012.20.141-148
Ethical aspects and dilemmas of preparing, writing and publishing of the scientific papers in the biomedical journals
Abstract
Introduction: In this paper author discussed about preparing and submitting manuscripts - scientific, research, professional papers, reviews and case reports. Author described it from the Editor's perspective, and specially talked about ethical aspects of authorship, conflict of interest, copyright, plagiarism and duplicate publication from the point of view of his experiences as Editor-in-Chief of several biomedical journals and Chief of Task Force of European Federation of Medical Informatics journals and member of Task Force of European Cardiology Society journals. The scientific process relies on trust and credibility. The scientific community demands high ethical standards to conduct biomedical research and to publish scientific contents. During the last decade, disclosure of conflicts of interest (COI ), (also called competing loyalties, competing interests or dual commitments), has been considered as a key element to guarantee the credibility of the scientific process. Biases in design, analysis and interpretation of studies may arise when authors or sponsors have vested interests. Therefore, COI should be made clear to the readers to facilitate their own judgment and interpretation of their relevance and potential implications.
Results and discussion: Authors are responsible to fully disclose potential COI . In October 2009 the ICMJE proposed an electronic "uniform" format for COI disclosure. Four main areas were addressed: authors´ associations with entities that supported the submitted manuscript (indefinite time frame), associations with commercial entities with potential interest in the general area of the manuscript (time frame 36 months), financial association of their spouse and children and, finally, non-financial associations potentially relevant to the submitted manuscript. Consumers of medical scholarship expect a reliable system of disclosure in which journals and authors make disclosures appropriately and consistently. There is a stigma surrounding the reporting of COI that should be progressively overcome. Further actions are required to increase awareness of the importance of COI disclosure and to promote policies aimed to enhance transparency in biomedical research. In this article author discuss about important ethical dilemmas in preparing, writing and publishing of scientific manuscripts in biomedical journals.
Keywords: acknowledgement; authorship; biomedical journals; conflict of interest; copyright; duplicate publication.; ethics; medical science; plagiarism.
Similar articles
-
Conflict of interest policies in science and medical journals: editorial practices and author disclosures.Sci Eng Ethics. 2001 Apr;7(2):205-18. doi: 10.1007/s11948-001-0041-7. Sci Eng Ethics. 2001. PMID: 11349360
-
Rules to be adopted for publishing a scientific paper.Ann Ital Chir. 2016;87:1-3. Ann Ital Chir. 2016. PMID: 28474609
-
Scientific journals and their authors' financial interests: a pilot study.Psychother Psychosom. 1998 Jul-Oct;67(4-5):194-201. doi: 10.1159/000012281. Psychother Psychosom. 1998. PMID: 9693346
-
Conflicts of interest policies and disclosure requirements among European Society of Cardiology national cardiovascular journals.J Cardiovasc Med (Hagerstown). 2012 Jun;13(6):386-94. doi: 10.2459/JCM.0b013e328354a803. J Cardiovasc Med (Hagerstown). 2012. PMID: 22551690 Review.
-
Ethical issues in biomedical publications.Hum Fertil (Camb). 2001;4(4):261-6. doi: 10.1080/1464727012000199631. Hum Fertil (Camb). 2001. PMID: 11719723 Review.
Cited by
-
Impacts of Novel Vietnamese Government Regulations on Radiological PhD and Professorship Candidates: an Initial Report.Acta Inform Med. 2020 Jun;28(2):152-156. doi: 10.5455/aim.2020.28.152-156. Acta Inform Med. 2020. PMID: 32742070 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Review of the Journal Medical Archives in 2013.Med Arch. 2014;68(1):4-5. doi: 10.5455/medarh.2014.68.4-5. Med Arch. 2014. PMID: 24783901 Free PMC article. No abstract available.
-
Reporting transparency: making the ethical mandate explicit.BMC Med. 2016 Mar 16;14:44. doi: 10.1186/s12916-016-0587-5. BMC Med. 2016. PMID: 26979591 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Plagiarism: an egregious form of misconduct.N Am J Med Sci. 2015 Feb;7(2):77-80. doi: 10.4103/1947-2714.152084. N Am J Med Sci. 2015. PMID: 25789254 Free PMC article.
-
Plagiarism in scientific research and publications and how to prevent it.Mater Sociomed. 2014 Apr;26(2):141-6. doi: 10.5455/msm.2014.26.141-146. Epub 2014 Apr 11. Mater Sociomed. 2014. PMID: 24944543 Free PMC article. Review.
References
-
- Marusic A. Problems of editors with authorship in small medical journals. The International Journal of Occupational and Environmental Medicine. 2011;2(3):130–132. - PubMed
-
- O’Dowd A. Peer review system needs thorough evaluation. MPs hear. BMJ. 2011;342:d3046. doi: 10.1136/bmj.d3046.
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources