Evaluation of the palatal soft tissue thickness by cone-beam computed tomography
- PMID: 23323243
- PMCID: PMC3542449
- DOI: 10.4041/kjod.2012.42.6.291
Evaluation of the palatal soft tissue thickness by cone-beam computed tomography
Abstract
Objective: The purposes of this study were to measure the palatal soft tissue thickness at popular placement sites of temporary anchorage devices (TADs) by cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT) and evaluate the age, gender, and positional differences in this parameter.
Methods: The study sample consisted of 23 children (10 boys and 13 girls; mean age, 10.87 ± 1.24 years; range, 6.7 to 12.6 years) and 27 adults (14 men and 13 women; mean age, 21.35 ± 1.14 years; range, 20.0 to 23.8 years). Nine mediolateral and nine anteroposterior intersecting reference lines were drawn on CBCT scans of the 50 subjects, and the resultant measurement areas were designated according to their mediolateral (i.e., lateral, medial, and sutural) and anteroposterior (i.e., anterior, middle, and posterior) positions. Repeated-measures analysis of variance was performed to analyze intragroup and intergroup differences.
Results: No significant age and gender differences were found (p = 0.309 and 0.124, respectively). Further, no significant anteroposterior change was observed (p = 0.350). However, the lateral area presented the thickest soft tissue whereas the sutural area had the thinnest soft tissue (p < 0.001).
Conclusions: Clinical selection of the placement sites of TADs should be guided by knowledge of the positional variations in the palatal soft tissue thickness in addition to other contributing factors of TAD stability.
Keywords: CBCT; Palatal soft tissue; TADs.
Conflict of interest statement
The authors report no commercial, proprietary, or financial interest in the products or companies described in this article.
Figures




Similar articles
-
Evaluation of interradicular space, soft tissue, and hard tissue of the posterior palatal alveolar process for orthodontic mini-implant, using cone-beam computed tomography.Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2021 Apr;159(4):460-469. doi: 10.1016/j.ajodo.2020.01.019. Epub 2021 Jan 29. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2021. PMID: 33526299
-
Evaluation of palatal bone density in adults and adolescents for application of skeletal anchorage devices.Angle Orthod. 2012 Jul;82(4):625-31. doi: 10.2319/071311-445.1. Epub 2011 Nov 11. Angle Orthod. 2012. PMID: 22077190 Free PMC article.
-
Evaluation of Palatal Bone Thickness for Insertion of Orthodontic Mini-Implants in Adults and Adolescents.J Craniofac Surg. 2017 Sep;28(6):1468-1471. doi: 10.1097/SCS.0000000000003906. J Craniofac Surg. 2017. PMID: 28841595
-
Palatal bone thickness measured by palatal index method using cone-beam computed tomography in nonorthodontic patients for placement of mini-implants.J Pharm Bioallied Sci. 2015 Apr;7(Suppl 1):S107-10. doi: 10.4103/0975-7406.155843. J Pharm Bioallied Sci. 2015. PMID: 26015685 Free PMC article.
-
Palatal bone thickness compared with cone-beam computed tomography in adolescents and adults for mini-implant placement.Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2012 Aug;142(2):207-12. doi: 10.1016/j.ajodo.2012.03.027. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2012. PMID: 22858330
Cited by
-
Distalization with a modified C-palatal plate for severe upper crowding and a missing lower incisor.Korean J Orthod. 2020 Jan;50(1):52-62. doi: 10.4041/kjod.2020.50.1.52. Epub 2020 Jan 22. Korean J Orthod. 2020. PMID: 32042720 Free PMC article.
-
Evaluation of the cone-beam computed tomography accuracy in measuring soft tissue thickness in different areas of the jaws.J Indian Soc Periodontol. 2019 Jul-Aug;23(4):334-338. doi: 10.4103/jisp.jisp_675_18. J Indian Soc Periodontol. 2019. PMID: 31367130 Free PMC article.
-
Evaluation of Palatal Thickness for the Placement of MARPE Device among a Cohort of Iraqi-Kurdish Population: A Retrospective CBCT Study.Int J Dent. 2024 Aug 28;2024:6741187. doi: 10.1155/2024/6741187. eCollection 2024. Int J Dent. 2024. PMID: 39234263 Free PMC article.
-
Comparison of treatment effects between the modified C-palatal plate and cervical pull headgear for total arch distalization in adults.Korean J Orthod. 2017 Nov;47(6):375-383. doi: 10.4041/kjod.2017.47.6.375. Epub 2017 Sep 29. Korean J Orthod. 2017. PMID: 29090125 Free PMC article.
-
Displacement and stress distribution of the maxillofacial complex during maxillary protraction using palatal plates: A three-dimensional finite element analysis.Korean J Orthod. 2018 Sep;48(5):304-315. doi: 10.4041/kjod.2018.48.5.304. Epub 2018 Aug 8. Korean J Orthod. 2018. PMID: 30206529 Free PMC article.
References
-
- Kinzinger GS, Eren M, Diedrich PR. Treatment effects of intraoral appliances with conventional anchorage designs for non-compliance maxillary molar distalization: a literature review. Eur J Orthod. 2008;30:558–571. - PubMed
-
- Papadopoulos MA, Tarawneh F. The use of miniscrew implants for temporary skeletal anchorage in orthodontics: a comprehensive review. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod. 2007;103:e6–e15. - PubMed
-
- Hoste S, Vercruyssen M, Quirynen M, Willems G. Risk factors and indications of orthodontic temporary anchorage devices: a literature review. Aust Orthod J. 2008;24:140–148. - PubMed
-
- Reynders R, Ronchi L, Bipat S. Mini-implants in orthodontics: a systematic review of the literature. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2009;135:564.e1–564.e19. - PubMed
-
- Chen YJ, Chang HH, Huang CY, Hung HC, Lai EH, Yao CC. A retrospective analysis of the failure rate of three different orthodontic skeletal anchorage systems. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2007;18:768–775. - PubMed
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources