Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2013 Jun;45(5):1237-41.
doi: 10.1007/s11250-013-0353-z. Epub 2013 Jan 17.

Neospora caninum causes severe economic losses in cattle in the humid pampa region of Argentina

Affiliations

Neospora caninum causes severe economic losses in cattle in the humid pampa region of Argentina

Dadin Moore et al. Trop Anim Health Prod. 2013 Jun.

Erratum in

Abstract

This work estimates the economic losses due to Neospora abortions in the humid pampa region of Argentina.The total dairy and beef cattle population at risk of abortion is 1,771,326 and 9,726,684 head, respectively. In dairy cattle, there was an 8 % risk of experiencing abortion due to a variety of causes, but 16.5 % of them were due to Neospora caninum. The economic losses were estimated at US$1,415 (1,400-1,431) per abortion, which equates to a total loss of US$33,097,221 (15,622,600-119,349,693) for the dairy industry at the humid pampa region of Argentina. In beef cattle, the overall risk of abortion was estimated to be 4.5 % for all pregnancies,whereas 6.7 % are specifically due to N. caninum, with an economic loss of US$440 (range, 150-730) per abortion.This amounts to an annual loss to the beef industry of US$12,903,440 (range, 1,130,700-42,070,630) in the same area. The results of this study show that Neospora infections and thus abortions cause severe economic impacts in the dairy and beef industries in the humid pampa region of Argentina, which is one the most important areas of cattle production in the world [corrected].

PubMed Disclaimer

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. J Am Vet Med Assoc. 2000 Sep 15;217(6):881-7 - PubMed
    1. Aust Vet J. 2000 Apr;78(4):258-61 - PubMed
    1. Vet Parasitol. 2006 Nov 30;142(1-2):23-34 - PubMed
    1. Vet Parasitol. 2009 Mar 9;160(1-2):51-4 - PubMed
    1. Vet Parasitol. 2008 Oct 1;156(3-4):163-7 - PubMed

Publication types

LinkOut - more resources