Diagnostic inaccuracy of smartphone applications for melanoma detection
- PMID: 23325302
- PMCID: PMC4019431
- DOI: 10.1001/jamadermatol.2013.2382
Diagnostic inaccuracy of smartphone applications for melanoma detection
Abstract
Objective: To measure the performance of smartphone applications that evaluate photographs of skin lesions and provide the user with feedback about the likelihood of malignancy.
Design: Case-control diagnostic accuracy study.
Setting: Academic dermatology department. PARTICIPANTS AND MATERIALS: Digital clinical images of pigmented cutaneous lesions (60 melanoma and 128 benign control lesions) with a histologic diagnosis rendered by a board-certified dermatopathologist, obtained before biopsy from patients undergoing lesion removal as a part of routine care.
Main outcome measures: Sensitivity, specificity, and positive and negative predictive values of 4 smartphone applications designed to aid nonclinician users in determining whether their skin lesion is benign or malignant.
Results: Sensitivity of the 4 tested applications ranged from 6.8% to 98.1%; specificity, 30.4% to 93.7%; positive predictive value, 33.3% to 42.1%; and negative predictive value, 65.4% to 97.0%. The highest sensitivity for melanoma diagnosis was observed for an application that sends the image directly to a board-certified dermatologist for analysis; the lowest, for applications that use automated algorithms to analyze images.
Conclusions: The performance of smartphone applications in assessing melanoma risk is highly variable, and 3 of 4 smartphone applications incorrectly classified 30% or more of melanomas as unconcerning. Reliance on these applications, which are not subject to regulatory oversight, in lieu of medical consultation can delay the diagnosis of melanoma and harm users.
Comment in
-
Diagnostic inaccuracy of smartphone applications for melanoma detection: representative lesion sets and the role for adjunctive technologies.JAMA Dermatol. 2013 Jul;149(7):884. doi: 10.1001/jamadermatol.2013.4334. JAMA Dermatol. 2013. PMID: 23864094 No abstract available.
-
Diagnostic inaccuracy of smartphone applications for melanoma detection--reply.JAMA Dermatol. 2013 Jul;149(7):885. doi: 10.1001/jamadermatol.2013.4337. JAMA Dermatol. 2013. PMID: 23864095 No abstract available.
Similar articles
-
Diagnostic inaccuracy of smartphone applications for melanoma detection: representative lesion sets and the role for adjunctive technologies.JAMA Dermatol. 2013 Jul;149(7):884. doi: 10.1001/jamadermatol.2013.4334. JAMA Dermatol. 2013. PMID: 23864094 No abstract available.
-
Diagnostic inaccuracy of smartphone applications for melanoma detection--reply.JAMA Dermatol. 2013 Jul;149(7):885. doi: 10.1001/jamadermatol.2013.4337. JAMA Dermatol. 2013. PMID: 23864095 No abstract available.
-
Extraction of ABCD rule features from skin lesions images with smartphone.Stud Health Technol Inform. 2012;177:242-7. Stud Health Technol Inform. 2012. PMID: 22942062
-
Smartphone applications for triaging adults with skin lesions that are suspicious for melanoma.Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2018 Dec 4;12(12):CD013192. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD013192. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2018. PMID: 30521685 Free PMC article.
-
Digital image analysis for diagnosis of cutaneous melanoma. Development of a highly effective computer algorithm based on analysis of 837 melanocytic lesions.Br J Dermatol. 2004 Nov;151(5):1029-38. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2133.2004.06210.x. Br J Dermatol. 2004. PMID: 15541081 Review.
Cited by
-
The promise and peril of mobile health applications for diabetes and endocrinology.Pediatr Diabetes. 2013 Jun;14(4):231-8. doi: 10.1111/pedi.12034. Epub 2013 Apr 30. Pediatr Diabetes. 2013. PMID: 23627878 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Optimizing cancer care through mobile health.Support Care Cancer. 2015 Jul;23(7):2183-8. doi: 10.1007/s00520-015-2627-7. Epub 2015 Feb 4. Support Care Cancer. 2015. PMID: 25649121 Review.
-
Smartphone-RCCT: an online repository of randomized controlled clinical trials of smartphone applications for chronic conditions.Trials. 2022 Oct 27;23(1):909. doi: 10.1186/s13063-022-06849-x. Trials. 2022. PMID: 36303168 Free PMC article.
-
Teledermatology Use in Remote Areas of French Guiana: Experience From a Long-Running System.Front Public Health. 2019 Dec 19;7:387. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2019.00387. eCollection 2019. Front Public Health. 2019. PMID: 31921751 Free PMC article.
-
Design and testing of a mobile health application rating tool.NPJ Digit Med. 2020 May 21;3:74. doi: 10.1038/s41746-020-0268-9. eCollection 2020. NPJ Digit Med. 2020. PMID: 32509971 Free PMC article.
References
-
- Brady MS, Oliveria SA, Christos PJ, et al. Patterns of detection in patients with cutaneous melanoma. Cancer. 2000 Jul 15;89(2):342–347. - PubMed
-
- Epstein DS, Lange JR, Gruber SB, Mofid M, Koch SE. Is physician detection associated with thinner melanomas? JAMA. 1999 Feb 17;281(7):640–643. - PubMed
-
- Kantor J, Kantor DE. Routine dermatologist-performed full-body skin examination and early melanoma detection. Arch Dermatol. 2009 Aug;145(8):873–876. - PubMed
-
- McGuire ST, Secrest AM, Andrulonis R, Ferris LK. Surveillance of patients for early detection of melanoma: patterns in dermatologist vs patient discovery. Arch Dermatol. Jun;147(6):673–678. - PubMed
-
- Morris DP. Health-care apps for smartphones pit FDA against tech industry. The Washington Post. 2012 Jun 22;
Publication types
MeSH terms
Grants and funding
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources
Medical