Evaluation of AJCC tumor staging for cutaneous squamous cell carcinoma and a proposed alternative tumor staging system
- PMID: 23325457
- DOI: 10.1001/jamadermatol.2013.2456
Evaluation of AJCC tumor staging for cutaneous squamous cell carcinoma and a proposed alternative tumor staging system
Abstract
Importance: This study proposes an alternative tumor staging system for cutaneous squamous cell carcinoma (CSCC) that more precisely defines the small subset of tumors with a high risk of metastasis and death.
Objective: To identify risk factors for poor outcomes in CSCC and evaluate the 2010 American Joint Committee on Cancer (AJCC) tumor (T) staging system's ability to stratify occurrence of these outcomes.
Design: Retrospective cohort study.
Setting: A single academic hospital.
Participants: Study participants were identified via a pathology and dermatopathology database search for patients diagnosed as having high-risk CSCC.
Results: Two hundred fifty-six primary high-risk CSCCs were included. Outcomes for AJCC tumor stages T2 to T4 were statistically indistinguishable because only 4 cases (<2% of the cohort) were AJCC stages T3 or T4, which require bone invasion. Subsequently, the bulk of poor outcomes (83% of nodal metastases, 92% of deaths from CSCC) occurred in AJCC stage T2 cases. An alternative tumor staging system was developed with the aim of better stratifying this stage T2 group. Four risk factors were found to be statistically independent prognostic factors for at least 2 outcomes of interest in multivariate modeling. These factors (poor differentiation, perineural invasion, tumor diameter ≥2 cm, invasion beyond subcutaneous fat) were incorporated in the alternative staging with 0 factors indicating T1, 1 factor indicating T2a; 2 to 3 factors, T2b; and 4 factors or bone invasion, T3. Stages T2a and T2b significantly differed in incidences of all 4 end points. Stage T2b tumors comprised only 19% of the cohort but accounted for 72% of nodal metastases and 83% of deaths from CSCC.
Conclusions and relevance: The proposed alternative tumor staging system offers improved prognostic discrimination via stratification of stage T2 tumors. Validation in other cohorts is needed. Meanwhile, stage T2b tumors are responsible for most poor outcomes and may be a focus of high-risk CSCC study.
Comment in
-
Staging cutaneous squamous cell carcinoma.JAMA Dermatol. 2013 Apr;149(4):472-4. doi: 10.1001/jamadermatol.2013.2385. JAMA Dermatol. 2013. PMID: 23325339 No abstract available.
Similar articles
-
Staging for cutaneous squamous cell carcinoma as a predictor of sentinel lymph node biopsy results: meta-analysis of American Joint Committee on Cancer criteria and a proposed alternative system.JAMA Dermatol. 2014 Jan;150(1):19-24. doi: 10.1001/jamadermatol.2013.6675. JAMA Dermatol. 2014. PMID: 24226651 Review.
-
Stratification of Poor Outcomes for Cutaneous Squamous Cell Carcinoma in Immunosuppressed Patients Using the American Joint Committee on Cancer Eighth Edition and Brigham and Women's Hospital Staging Systems.Dermatol Surg. 2019 Sep;45(9):1117-1124. doi: 10.1097/DSS.0000000000001774. Dermatol Surg. 2019. PMID: 30640779
-
Validating 4 Staging Systems for Cutaneous Squamous Cell Carcinoma Using Population-Based Data: A Nested Case-Control Study.JAMA Dermatol. 2018 Apr 1;154(4):428-434. doi: 10.1001/jamadermatol.2017.6428. JAMA Dermatol. 2018. PMID: 29516080 Free PMC article.
-
Evaluation of American Joint Committee on Cancer, International Union Against Cancer, and Brigham and Women's Hospital tumor staging for cutaneous squamous cell carcinoma.J Clin Oncol. 2014 Feb 1;32(4):327-34. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2012.48.5326. Epub 2013 Dec 23. J Clin Oncol. 2014. PMID: 24366933 Free PMC article.
-
Prevalence of poor outcomes in cutaneous squamous cell carcinoma by AJCC and BWH tumor stages: A systematic review and meta-analysis.J Am Acad Dermatol. 2025 May;92(5):1064-1071. doi: 10.1016/j.jaad.2024.11.082. Epub 2025 Jan 29. J Am Acad Dermatol. 2025. PMID: 39889854
Cited by
-
Therapeutic Approaches for Non-Melanoma Skin Cancer: Standard of Care and Emerging Modalities.Int J Mol Sci. 2024 Jun 27;25(13):7056. doi: 10.3390/ijms25137056. Int J Mol Sci. 2024. PMID: 39000164 Free PMC article. Review.
-
High-Risk Cutaneous Squamous Cell Carcinoma of the Head and Neck: A Clinical Review.Ann Surg Oncol. 2021 Dec;28(13):9009-9030. doi: 10.1245/s10434-021-10108-9. Epub 2021 Jun 30. Ann Surg Oncol. 2021. PMID: 34195900 Review.
-
Immunosuppression and Mohs surgery: Navigating risks in high-stakes skin cancer management.J Eur Acad Dermatol Venereol. 2025 Feb;39(2):259-260. doi: 10.1111/jdv.20493. J Eur Acad Dermatol Venereol. 2025. PMID: 39853852 Free PMC article. No abstract available.
-
Interventions for non-metastatic squamous cell carcinoma of the skin: systematic review and pooled analysis of observational studies.BMJ. 2013 Nov 4;347:f6153. doi: 10.1136/bmj.f6153. BMJ. 2013. PMID: 24191270 Free PMC article.
-
Squamous cell carcinoma of the scalp causing cortical venous thrombosis and Intraparenchymal hematoma.eNeurologicalSci. 2020 Jun 18;20:100251. doi: 10.1016/j.ensci.2020.100251. eCollection 2020 Sep. eNeurologicalSci. 2020. PMID: 32613095 Free PMC article.