Percutaneous left atrial appendage closure for stroke prophylaxis in patients with atrial fibrillation: 2.3-Year Follow-up of the PROTECT AF (Watchman Left Atrial Appendage System for Embolic Protection in Patients with Atrial Fibrillation) Trial
- PMID: 23325525
- DOI: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.112.114389
Percutaneous left atrial appendage closure for stroke prophylaxis in patients with atrial fibrillation: 2.3-Year Follow-up of the PROTECT AF (Watchman Left Atrial Appendage System for Embolic Protection in Patients with Atrial Fibrillation) Trial
Abstract
Background: The multicenter PROTECT AF study (Watchman Left Atrial Appendage System for Embolic Protection in Patients With Atrial Fibrillation) was conducted to determine whether percutaneous left atrial appendage closure with a filter device (Watchman) was noninferior to warfarin for stroke prevention in atrial fibrillation.
Methods and results: Patients (n=707) with nonvalvular atrial fibrillation and at least 1 risk factor (age >75 years, hypertension, heart failure, diabetes, or prior stroke/transient ischemic attack) were randomized to either the Watchman device (n=463) or continued warfarin (n=244) in a 2:1 ratio. After device implantation, warfarin was continued for ≈45 days, followed by clopidogrel for 4.5 months and lifelong aspirin. Study discontinuation rates were 15.3% (71/463) and 22.5% (55/244) for the Watchman and warfarin groups, respectively. The time in therapeutic range for the warfarin group was 66%. The composite primary efficacy end point included stroke, systemic embolism, and cardiovascular death, and the primary analysis was by intention to treat. After 1588 patient-years of follow-up (mean 2.3±1.1 years), the primary efficacy event rates were 3.0% and 4.3% (percent per 100 patient-years) in the Watchman and warfarin groups, respectively (relative risk, 0.71; 95% confidence interval, 0.44%-1.30% per year), which met the criteria for noninferiority (probability of noninferiority >0.999). There were more primary safety events in the Watchman group (5.5% per year; 95% confidence interval, 4.2%-7.1% per year) than in the control group (3.6% per year; 95% confidence interval, 2.2%-5.3% per year; relative risk, 1.53; 95% confidence interval, 0.95-2.70).
Conclusions: The "local" strategy of left atrial appendage closure is noninferior to "systemic" anticoagulation with warfarin. PROTECT AF has, for the first time, implicated the left atrial appendage in the pathogenesis of stroke in atrial fibrillation.
Clinical trial registration: : URL: http://www.clinicaltrials.gov. Unique identifier: NCT00129545.
Comment in
-
Atrial fibrillation: Long-term follow-up from PROTECT AF trial reported.Nat Rev Cardiol. 2013 Mar;10(3):120. doi: 10.1038/nrcardio.2013.9. Epub 2013 Feb 5. Nat Rev Cardiol. 2013. PMID: 23380973 No abstract available.
Similar articles
-
Safety of percutaneous left atrial appendage closure: results from the Watchman Left Atrial Appendage System for Embolic Protection in Patients with AF (PROTECT AF) clinical trial and the Continued Access Registry.Circulation. 2011 Feb 1;123(4):417-24. doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.110.976449. Epub 2011 Jan 17. Circulation. 2011. PMID: 21242484 Clinical Trial.
-
Left atrial appendage closure with the Watchman device in patients with a contraindication for oral anticoagulation: the ASAP study (ASA Plavix Feasibility Study With Watchman Left Atrial Appendage Closure Technology).J Am Coll Cardiol. 2013 Jun 25;61(25):2551-6. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2013.03.035. Epub 2013 Apr 10. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2013. PMID: 23583249 Clinical Trial.
-
5-Year Outcomes After Left Atrial Appendage Closure: From the PREVAIL and PROTECT AF Trials.J Am Coll Cardiol. 2017 Dec 19;70(24):2964-2975. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2017.10.021. Epub 2017 Nov 4. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2017. PMID: 29103847 Clinical Trial.
-
Overview of the Food and Drug Administration circulatory system devices panel meetings on WATCHMAN left atrial appendage closure therapy.Am J Cardiol. 2015 Feb 1;115(3):378-84. doi: 10.1016/j.amjcard.2014.11.011. Epub 2014 Nov 12. Am J Cardiol. 2015. PMID: 25579887 Review.
-
Clinical efficacy and safety comparison of Watchman device versus ACP/Amulet device for percutaneous left atrial appendage closure in patients with nonvalvular atrial fibrillation: A study-level meta-analysis of clinical trials.Clin Cardiol. 2023 Feb;46(2):117-125. doi: 10.1002/clc.23956. Epub 2022 Nov 30. Clin Cardiol. 2023. PMID: 36448417 Free PMC article. Review.
Cited by
-
How to walk the tightrope between harm and protection in selecting the optimal antiplatelet treatment strategy after transcatheter left atrial appendage occlusion.Postepy Kardiol Interwencyjnej. 2015;11(1):5-8. doi: 10.5114/pwki.2015.49177. Epub 2015 Mar 6. Postepy Kardiol Interwencyjnej. 2015. PMID: 25848363 Free PMC article. No abstract available.
-
LAA occlusion is effective and safe in very high-risk atrial fibrillation patients with prior stroke: results from the multicentre German LAARGE registry.Clin Res Cardiol. 2024 Oct;113(10):1451-1462. doi: 10.1007/s00392-024-02376-8. Epub 2024 Jan 31. Clin Res Cardiol. 2024. PMID: 38294498 Free PMC article.
-
Rationale and design of a randomized clinical trial evaluating the efficacy of mechanical neuroprotection in reducing the risk of silent brain infarcts associated with percutaneous left atrial appendage closure: study protocol for a LAAC-SBI trial.Trials. 2023 Nov 23;24(1):749. doi: 10.1186/s13063-023-07766-3. Trials. 2023. PMID: 37996955 Free PMC article.
-
Percutaneous left atrial appendage occlusion - treatment outcomes and 6 months of follow-up - a single-center experience.Kardiochir Torakochirurgia Pol. 2016 Jun;13(2):98-104. doi: 10.5114/kitp.2016.61041. Epub 2016 Jun 30. Kardiochir Torakochirurgia Pol. 2016. PMID: 27516780 Free PMC article.
-
Assessment of peri-device leaks after interventional left atrial appendage closure using standardized imaging by cardiac computed tomography angiography.Int J Cardiovasc Imaging. 2019 Apr;35(4):725-731. doi: 10.1007/s10554-018-1493-z. Epub 2018 Nov 12. Int J Cardiovasc Imaging. 2019. PMID: 30421354
Publication types
MeSH terms
Substances
Associated data
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources
Medical
Miscellaneous