Effect of intravenous infusion of dexmedetomidine on perioperative haemodynamic changes and postoperative recovery: A study with entropy analysis
- PMID: 23325938
- PMCID: PMC3546240
- DOI: 10.4103/0019-5049.104571
Effect of intravenous infusion of dexmedetomidine on perioperative haemodynamic changes and postoperative recovery: A study with entropy analysis
Abstract
Background: Dexmedetomidine, an α2 agonist, when used as an adjuvant in general anaesthesia attenuates stress response to various noxious stimuli, maintains perioperative haemodynamic stability and provides sedation without significant respiratory depression postoperatively.
Methods: Sixty patients were randomly divided into two groups of 30 each. In group A, fentanyl 2 μg/kg and in group B dexmedetomidine were given intravenously as loading dose of 1 μg/kg over 10 min prior to induction. After induction with thiopentone, in group B, dexmedetomidine was given as infusion at a dose of 0.2-0.8 μg/kg. Sevoflurane was used as inhalation agent in both groups. Haemodynamic variables and entropy (response entropy and state entropy) were recorded continuously. Postoperative sedation and recovery were assessed by sedation score and modified Aldrete's score, respectively.
Results: Dexmedetomidine significantly attenuates stress response at intubation with lesser increase in heart rate (10% vs. 17%), systolic blood pressure (6% vs. 23%) and diastolic blood pressure (7% vs. 20%) as compared to the control group (P<0.05). Intraoperatively, an average of 8% fall in systolic blood pressure and 8.16% fall in diastolic pressure in the test group as compared to 3.6% rise in systolic and 3.3% in diastolic pressure of the control group was observed. Postoperatively, the test group showed significant sedation at 2 h as compared to the control group (P=0.00) and recovery was better in the control group for the first 2 h post extubation.
Conclusion: Dexmedetomidine attenuates various stress responses during surgery and maintains the haemodynamic stability when used as an adjuvant in general anaesthesia. Also, the sedative action of dexmedetomidine delays recovery for the first few hours post extubation.
Keywords: Dexmedetomidine; entropy; perioperative haemodynamics; recovery.
Conflict of interest statement
Figures


Similar articles
-
Effects of dexmedetomidine on perioperative monitoring parameters and recovery in patients undergoing laparoscopic cholecystectomy.Anesth Essays Res. 2016 May-Aug;10(2):278-83. doi: 10.4103/0259-1162.171460. Anesth Essays Res. 2016. PMID: 27212761 Free PMC article.
-
Effect of Dexmedetomidine Versus Fentanyl on Haemodynamic Response to Patients Undergoing Elective Laparoscopic Surgery: A Double Blinded Randomized Controlled Study.J Clin Diagn Res. 2017 Apr;11(4):UC01-UC04. doi: 10.7860/JCDR/2017/24152.9563. Epub 2017 Apr 1. J Clin Diagn Res. 2017. PMID: 28571235 Free PMC article.
-
Dexmedetomidine attenuates sympathoadrenal response to tracheal intubation and reduces perioperative anaesthetic requirement.Indian J Anaesth. 2011 Jul;55(4):352-7. doi: 10.4103/0019-5049.84846. Indian J Anaesth. 2011. PMID: 22013250 Free PMC article.
-
The effect of dexmedetomidine continuous infusion as an adjuvant to general anesthesia on sevoflurane requirements: A study based on entropy analysis.J Anaesthesiol Clin Pharmacol. 2013 Jul;29(3):318-22. doi: 10.4103/0970-9185.117066. J Anaesthesiol Clin Pharmacol. 2013. PMID: 24106354 Free PMC article.
-
Effect of dexmedetomidine on haemodynamic responses to laryngoscopy and intubation : perioperative haemodynamics and anaesthetic requirements.Drugs R D. 2006;7(1):43-52. doi: 10.2165/00126839-200607010-00004. Drugs R D. 2006. PMID: 16620136 Clinical Trial.
Cited by
-
Comparative Study of the Effect of Dexmedetomidine Vs. Fentanyl on Haemodynamic Response in Patients Undergoing Elective Laparoscopic Surgery.J Clin Diagn Res. 2017 Sep;11(9):UC04-UC08. doi: 10.7860/JCDR/2017/27020.10578. Epub 2017 Sep 1. J Clin Diagn Res. 2017. PMID: 29207810 Free PMC article.
-
Comparison of Sedation with Dexmedetomidine Alfentanil Versus Ketamine-Alfentanil in Patients Undergoing Closed Reduction of Nasal Fractures.Anesth Pain Med. 2020 Aug 25;10(4):e102946. doi: 10.5812/aapm.102946. eCollection 2020 Aug. Anesth Pain Med. 2020. PMID: 33134144 Free PMC article.
-
The effect of low-dose dexmedetomidine on hemodynamics and anesthetic requirement during bis-spectral index-guided total intravenous anesthesia.J Clin Monit Comput. 2016 Aug;30(4):429-35. doi: 10.1007/s10877-015-9735-2. Epub 2015 Jul 11. J Clin Monit Comput. 2016. PMID: 26162785 Clinical Trial.
-
Comparison of dexmedetomidine with fentanyl for maintenance of intraoperative hemodynamics in hypertensive patients undergoing major surgery: A randomized controlled trial.Anesth Essays Res. 2016 May-Aug;10(2):332-7. doi: 10.4103/0259-1162.176408. Anesth Essays Res. 2016. PMID: 27212770 Free PMC article.
-
Subcutaneously administered dexmedetomidine is efficiently absorbed and is associated with attenuated cardiovascular effects in healthy volunteers.Eur J Clin Pharmacol. 2018 Aug;74(8):1047-1054. doi: 10.1007/s00228-018-2461-1. Epub 2018 Apr 17. Eur J Clin Pharmacol. 2018. PMID: 29666901 Clinical Trial.
References
-
- Savola JM, Ruskoaho H, Puurunen J, Salonen JS, Kärki NT. Evidence for medetomidine as a selective and potent agonist at alpha 2-adrenoreceptors. J Auton Pharmacol. 1986;6:275–84. - PubMed
-
- Gurbet A, Basagan-Mogol E, Turker G, Ugun F, Kaya FN, Ozcan B. Intraoperative infusion of dexmedetomidine reduces perioperative analgesic requirements. Can J Anaesth. 2006;53:646–52. - PubMed
-
- Ebert TJ, Hall JE, Barney JA, Uhrich TD, Colinco MD. The effects of increasing plasma concentrations of dexmedetomidine in humans. Anesthesiology. 2000;93:382–94. - PubMed
-
- Hall JE, Uhrich TD, Barney JA, Arain SR, Ebert TJ. Sedative, amnestic, and analgesic properties of small-dose dexmedetomidine infusions. Anesth Analg. 2000;90:699–705. - PubMed
-
- White PF, Song D. New criteria for fast-tracking after outpatient anesthesia: A comparison with the modified Aldrete's scoring system. Anesth Analg. 1999;88:1069–72. - PubMed