Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2012 Nov;46(6):685-9.
doi: 10.4103/0019-5413.104214.

Monoaxial distraction of ulna to second metacarpal followed by single bone forearm in massive post infective radial bone loss

Affiliations

Monoaxial distraction of ulna to second metacarpal followed by single bone forearm in massive post infective radial bone loss

Jitendra N Pal et al. Indian J Orthop. 2012 Nov.

Abstract

Introduction: Radial bone loss associated with gross manus valgus deformity can be managed by open reduction internal fixation using intervening strut bone graft, callus distraction using ring or monoaxial fixator, and achieving union by distraction histogenesis. These methods are particularly suitable when bone loss is small. Single or staged procedure is described for congenital as well as in acquired extensive bone loss of radius. Distraction through radial proximal to distal segments, to achieve reduction of distal radio-ulnar joint (DRUJ), is also described in acquired cases. In the present series, functional results of distraction through ulna to 2(nd) metacarpal is studied alongwith, functional status of hand, stability of wrist, level of patient's satisfaction are also studied.

Materials and methods: 7 unilateral cases of radial loss (M = 5, F = 2) affecting 4 right hands of mean age 17 years (range 9 to 24 years) were included in this study. They were treated by distracting through ulna to 2(nd) metacarpal to achieve DRUJ alignment in first stage. Subsequently ulna was osteotomised and translated to distal stump of radius. It was then fixed to the distal radial remnant in 30° pronation in dominant and 30° supination non dominant hands.

Results: Union was achieved in all cases associated with beneficial cross union of distal ulna. Hand functions improved near to normal, with fully corrected stable wrist joint, hypertrophied ulna and without recurrence. All of them had practically complete loss of forearm rotations, however patients were fully satisfied.

Conclusion: This method is particularly suitable when associated with 6 cm or more radial bone loss. But when loss is small, sacrifice of one bone may not be justifiable.

Keywords: Massive radial shaft loss; monoaxial distractor; single bone forearm; ulna to metacarpal distraction.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Conflict of Interest: None.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
X rays images (a) showing gap between segments and amount of DRUJ dislocation (b) showing after applying distractor (c) Post fusion X-ray image when longitudinal K-wire in position (d) Post operated X-ray after complete fusion
Figure 2
Figure 2
Clinical photographs (a) showing radial deviation (b) with attempted ulnar deviation (c) during writing at final followup (d) during eating at final followup

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Sayre RH. A contribution to the study of club hand. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1894;s1-6:208–16.
    1. Gupta DK, Kumar G. Gap nonunion of forearm bones treated by modified Nicoll's technique. Indian J Orthop. 2010;44:84–8. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Jain AK, Sinha S. Infected nonunion of the long bones. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2005;431:57–65. - PubMed
    1. Ono CM, Albertson KS, Reinker KA, Lipp EB. Acquired radial clubhand deformitydue to osteomyelitis. J Pediatr Orthop. 1995;15:161–8. - PubMed
    1. Saini N, Patni P, Gupta SP, Chaudhury L, Sharma V. Management of radial clubhand with gradual distraction followed by centralization. Indian J Orthop. 2009;43:292–300. - PMC - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources