Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2012 Mar;74(2):174-8.
doi: 10.4103/0250-474X.103857.

Development and Evaluation of Patient Information Leaflets (PIL) Usefulness

Affiliations

Development and Evaluation of Patient Information Leaflets (PIL) Usefulness

R Adepu et al. Indian J Pharm Sci. 2012 Mar.

Abstract

A prospective study was conducted to develop, validate and assess the usefulness of the patient information leaflets for selected diseases among the patient population. Flesch readability ease score, Baker Able leaflet design criteria were applied to develop the patient information leaflets. The leaflets were validated for both content and translation. Eligible patients meeting the study criteria were enrolled in the study. Suitably designed knowledge, attitude and practice questionnaire was administered at base line followed by patient education complimented with an information leaflet. After a month, knowledge, attitude and practice questionnaire was administered once again to assess the influence of education and usefulness of patient information leaflets on knowledge, attitude and practice scores. The mean readability score of the information leaflets is 80 and Baker Able leaflet design criteria score is 22. Post education knowledge, attitude and practice scores were significantly (P<0.0001) improved in all the enrolled patients in all disease. The study concludes that patient education complemented with suitably designed information leaflet has greater impact on knowledge, attitude and practice of the patients towards their disease management.

Keywords: Layout and design score; patient information leaflets; readability score.

PubMed Disclaimer

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Wilson M, Robinson EJ, Blenkinsopp A, Panton R. Customer recall of information given in community pharmacy. Int J Pharm Pract. 1992;1:152–9.
    1. Hulka B, Cassel JC, Kupper LL, Burdette JA. Communication, compliance and concordance between physicians and patients with prescribed medications. Am J Public Health. 1976;66:847–53. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Louis A, Halparin JA. Effects of written drug information on patient knowledge and compliance: A literature review. Am J Public Health. 1979;69:47–52. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Nathan JP, Zerilli T, Cicero LA, Rosenberg JM. Patient's use and perception of medication information leaflets. Ann Pharmacother. 2007;41:777–82. - PubMed
    1. Gibbs S, Waters WE, George CF. Prescription Information leaflets, a national survey. J R Soc Med. 1990;83:292–7. - PMC - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources