Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2012 Oct;3(4):314-9.
doi: 10.4103/0976-500X.103688.

Comparison of efficacy and safety of two parenteral iron preparations in pregnant women

Affiliations

Comparison of efficacy and safety of two parenteral iron preparations in pregnant women

Jatin V Dhanani et al. J Pharmacol Pharmacother. 2012 Oct.

Abstract

Objective: To compare the efficacy and safety with a fixed dose of two parenteral iron preparations, iron sucrose complex and iron sorbitol citric acid as per the current practice.

Materials and methods: A prospective randomized open label study was conducted. In this study, 60 pregnant women with hemoglobin less than 8.5 g/dl received a fixed dose of either IV iron sucrose or IM iron sorbitol citric acid therapy. The efficacy of the therapy was assessed by laboratory parameters such as hemoglobin, hematocrit, MCV, MCH, and serum ferritin level after 14 and 28 days. To assess the safety, adverse drug reactions with both the therapies were recorded.

Results: Hemoglobin concentration increased significantly (P < 0.001) with respect to time in both the groups. The rise in the hemoglobin level in third and fourth weeks was significantly higher in iron sucrose (0.92 g/dl) than iron sorbitol citric acid therapy (0.56 g/dl). There was no significant change in the rise of the serum ferritin level after both the therapies. Adverse events were common with iron sorbitol citric acid therapy. However, no serious adverse drug reactions were observed.

Conclusions: No significant difference in the efficacy of both of the therapy. However, adverse events and dropout rates were much more common in the group of pregnant women who received iron sorbitol citric acid.

Keywords: Iron deficiency anemia; iron sorbitol citric acid therapy; iron sucrose therapy; pregnancy.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Conflict of Interest: None declared

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Mean increase in the hemoglobin concentration after iron sucrose and iron sorbitol citric acid therapy.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Serum ferritin level before and after iron sucrose and iron sorbitol citric acid therapy.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Breymann C. Iron deficiency and anemia in pregnancy: Modern aspects of diagnosis and therapy. Blood Cells Mol Dis. 2002;29:506–16. - PubMed
    1. Yaqoob N, Abbasi SM. Nutritional iron deficiency in our population. J Coll Physicians Surg Pak. 2002;12:395–7.
    1. Mukherji J. Iron deficiency anemia in pregnancy. Rational Drug Bulletin. 2002;12:2–5.
    1. Bentley DP. Iron metabolism and anaemia in pregnancy. In: Letsky EA, editor. Clinics in Haematology. Vol. 14. London: WB Saunders; 1985. pp. 613–28. - PubMed
    1. Saeed M, Khan TA, Khan SJ. Evaluation of risk factors in antenatal care. Mother Child. 1996;34:139–42.

LinkOut - more resources