A meta-analysis of the effects of energy intake on risk of digestive cancers
- PMID: 23326146
- PMCID: PMC3544043
- DOI: 10.3748/wjg.v18.i48.7362
A meta-analysis of the effects of energy intake on risk of digestive cancers
Abstract
Aim: To quantitatively assess the relationship between energy intake and the incidence of digestive cancers in a meta-analysis of cohort studies.
Methods: We searched MEDLINE, EMBASE, Science Citation Index Expanded, and the bibliographies of retrieved articles. Studies were included if they reported relative risks (RRs) and corresponding 95% CIs of digestive cancers with respect to total energy intake. When RRs were not available in the published article, they were computed from the exposure distributions. Data were extracted independently by two investigators and discrepancies were resolved by discussion with a third investigator. We performed fixed-effects meta-analyses and meta-regressions to compute the summary RR for highest versus lowest category of energy intake and for per unit energy intake and digestive cancer incidence by giving each study-specific RR a weight that was proportional to its precision.
Results: Nineteen studies consisting of 13 independent cohorts met the inclusion criteria. The studies included 995,577 participants and 5620 incident cases of digestive cancer with an average follow-up of 11.1 years. A significant inverse association was observed between energy intake and the incidence of digestive cancers. The RR of digestive cancers for the highest compared to the lowest caloric intake category was 0.90 (95% CI 0.81-0.98, P < 0.05). The RR for an increment of 239 kcal/d energy intake was 0.97 (95% CI 0.95-0.99, P < 0.05) in the fixed model. In subgroup analyses, we noted that energy intake was associated with a reduced risk of colorectal cancer (RR 0.90, 95% CI 0.81-0.99, P < 0.05) and an increased risk of gastric cancer (RR 1.19, 95% CI 1.08-1.31, P < 0.01). There appeared to be no association with esophageal (RR 0.96, 95% CI 0.86-1.07, P > 0.05) or pancreatic (RR 0.79, 95% CI 0.49-1.09, P > 0.05) cancer. Associations were also similar in studies from North America and Europe. The RR was 1.02 (95% CI 0.79-1.25, P > 0.05) when considering the six studies conducted in North America and 0.87 (95% CI 0.77-0.98, P < 0.05) for the five studies from Europe.
Conclusion: Our findings suggest that high energy intake may reduce the total digestive cancer incidence and has a preventive effect on colorectal cancer.
Keywords: Cancer prevention; Diet; Digestive cancer; Energy intake.
Figures



Similar articles
-
Fish consumption and risk of gastrointestinal cancers: a meta-analysis of cohort studies.World J Gastroenterol. 2014 Nov 7;20(41):15398-412. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v20.i41.15398. World J Gastroenterol. 2014. PMID: 25386090 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Coffee drinking and pancreatic cancer risk: a meta-analysis of cohort studies.World J Gastroenterol. 2011 Mar 7;17(9):1204-10. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v17.i9.1204. World J Gastroenterol. 2011. PMID: 21448427 Free PMC article.
-
Association between physical activity and digestive-system cancer: An updated systematic review and meta-analysis.J Sport Health Sci. 2021 Jan;10(1):4-13. doi: 10.1016/j.jshs.2020.09.009. Epub 2020 Sep 30. J Sport Health Sci. 2021. PMID: 33010525 Free PMC article.
-
Coffee consumption and risk of cancers: a meta-analysis of cohort studies.BMC Cancer. 2011 Mar 15;11:96. doi: 10.1186/1471-2407-11-96. BMC Cancer. 2011. PMID: 21406107 Free PMC article.
-
Omega-3 PUFA intake and the risk of digestive system cancers: A meta-analysis of observational studies.Medicine (Baltimore). 2020 May;99(19):e20119. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000020119. Medicine (Baltimore). 2020. PMID: 32384489 Free PMC article.
Cited by
-
Association between alcohol consumption and the risk of gastric cancer: a meta-analysis of prospective cohort studies.Oncotarget. 2017 Sep 14;8(48):84459-84472. doi: 10.18632/oncotarget.20880. eCollection 2017 Oct 13. Oncotarget. 2017. PMID: 29137439 Free PMC article.
-
Dietary Factors Associated with Pancreatic Cancer Risk in Minia, Egypt: Principal Component Analysis.Asian Pac J Cancer Prev. 2018 Feb 26;19(2):449-455. doi: 10.22034/APJCP.2018.19.2.449. Asian Pac J Cancer Prev. 2018. PMID: 29480075 Free PMC article. Clinical Trial.
-
Association between dairy intake and gastric cancer: a meta-analysis of observational studies.PLoS One. 2014 Jul 9;9(7):e101728. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0101728. eCollection 2014. PLoS One. 2014. PMID: 25006674 Free PMC article.
-
Risk of colonic cancer is not higher in the obese Lep(ob) mouse model compared to lean littermates.Pathol Oncol Res. 2013 Oct;19(4):867-74. doi: 10.1007/s12253-013-9656-7. Epub 2013 Jun 29. Pathol Oncol Res. 2013. PMID: 23813464
-
Modifiable factors and esophageal cancer: a systematic review of published meta-analyses.J Gastroenterol. 2018 Jan;53(1):37-51. doi: 10.1007/s00535-017-1375-5. Epub 2017 Aug 18. J Gastroenterol. 2018. PMID: 28821981
References
-
- Kushi LH, Byers T, Doyle C, Bandera EV, McCullough M, McTiernan A, Gansler T, Andrews KS, Thun MJ. American Cancer Society Guidelines on Nutrition and Physical Activity for cancer prevention: reducing the risk of cancer with healthy food choices and physical activity. CA Cancer J Clin. 2007;56:254–81; quiz 313-314. - PubMed
-
- Hursting SD, Lashinger LM, Colbert LH, Rogers CJ, Wheatley KW, Nunez NP, Mahabir S, Barrett JC, Forman MR, Perkins SN. Energy balance and carcinogenesis: underlying pathways and targets for intervention. Curr Cancer Drug Targets. 2007;7:484–491. - PubMed
-
- Howell A, Chapman M, Harvie M. Energy restriction for breast cancer prevention. Recent Results Cancer Res. 2009;181:97–111. - PubMed
-
- Loft S, Velthuis-te Wierik EJ, van den Berg H, Poulsen HE. Energy restriction and oxidative DNA damage in humans. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev. 1995;4:515–519. - PubMed
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Miscellaneous