Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2013;8(1):e54089.
doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0054089. Epub 2013 Jan 10.

Predictive modeling using a somatic mutational profile in ovarian high grade serous carcinoma

Affiliations

Predictive modeling using a somatic mutational profile in ovarian high grade serous carcinoma

Insuk Sohn et al. PLoS One. 2013.

Abstract

Purpose: Recent high-throughput sequencing technology has identified numerous somatic mutations across the whole exome in a variety of cancers. In this study, we generate a predictive model employing the whole exome somatic mutational profile of ovarian high-grade serous carcinomas (Ov-HGSCs) obtained from The Cancer Genome Atlas data portal.

Methods: A total of 311 patients were included for modeling overall survival (OS) and 259 patients were included for modeling progression free survival (PFS) in an analysis of 509 genes. The model was validated with complete leave-one-out cross-validation involving re-selecting genes for each iteration of the cross-validation procedure. Cross-validated Kaplan-Meier curves were generated. Cross-validated time dependent receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves were computed and the area under the curve (AUC) values were calculated from the ROC curves to estimate the predictive accuracy of the survival risk models.

Results: There was a significant difference in OS between the high-risk group (median, 28.1 months) and the low-risk group (median, 61.5 months) (permutated p-value <0.001). For PFS, there was also a significant difference in PFS between the high-risk group (10.9 months) and the low-risk group (22.3 months) (permutated p-value <0.001). Cross-validated AUC values were 0.807 for the OS and 0.747 for the PFS based on a defined landmark time t = 36 months. In comparisons between a predictive model containing only gene variables and a combined model containing both gene variables and clinical covariates, the predictive model containing gene variables without clinical covariates were effective and high AUC values for both OS and PFS were observed.

Conclusions: We designed a predictive model using a somatic mutation profile obtained from high-throughput genomic sequencing data in Ov-HGSC samples that may represent a new strategy for applying high-throughput sequencing data to clinical practice.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Competing Interests: The authors have declared that no competing interests exist.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1. Workflow of prognostic model building using somatic mutation profile in ovarian high-grade serous carcinoma.
Figure 2
Figure 2. Cross-validated Kaplan-Meier curves of the prognostic models.
Model containing only gene variables for overall survival (A) and progression free survival (B). Combined model containing both clinicopathological covariates and gene variables for overall survival (C) and progression free survival (D).
Figure 3
Figure 3. Cross-validated time dependent receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves and area under the curve (AUC).
ROC curve based on landmark time t = 36 months of the predictive model for overall survival (A) and progression free survival (B). Cross-validated time dependent AUC curves to compare the prognostic model containing only gene variables with the combined model containing both clinicopathological covariates and gene variables for overall survival (C) and progression free survival (D).

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Simon R, Radmacher MD, Dobbin K, McShane LM (2003) Pitfalls in the use of DNA microarray data for diagnostic and prognostic classification. J Natl Cancer Inst 95: 14–18. - PubMed
    1. Simon RM, Subramanian J, Li MC, Menezes S (2011) Using cross-validation to evaluate predictive accuracy of survival risk classifiers based on high-dimensional data. Brief Bioinform 12: 203–214. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Waldron L, Pintilie M, Tsao MS, Shepherd FA, Huttenhower C, et al. (2011) Optimized application of penalized regression methods to diverse genomic data. Bioinformatics 27: 3399–3406. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Molinaro AM, Simon R, Pfeiffer RM (2005) Prediction error estimation: a comparison of resampling methods. Bioinformatics 21: 3301–3307. - PubMed
    1. Moynahan ME, Pierce AJ, Jasin M (2001) BRCA2 is required for homology-directed repair of chromosomal breaks. Mol Cell 7: 263–272. - PubMed