Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2013 Mar;103(3):e93-9.
doi: 10.2105/AJPH.2012.300950. Epub 2013 Jan 17.

Population use, sales, and design: a multidimensional assessment of "light" cigarettes in the United States, 2009

Ilan Behm  1 , Natasha A Sokol, Ryan David Kennedy, Vaughan W Rees, Gregory N Connolly
Affiliations

Population use, sales, and design: a multidimensional assessment of "light" cigarettes in the United States, 2009

Ilan Behm et al. Am J Public Health. 2013 Mar.

Abstract

Objectives: We compared multiple measures of surveillance of "light" cigarette use, including population use, sales, and design features. Measures were obtained before the 2010 descriptors ban to establish a baseline for future evaluation of the effect of the ban.

Methods: We examined light cigarette use, sales, and design using 3 data sets from 2009. We assessed population use using National Survey on Drug Use and Health data. Sales data were drawn from AC Nielsen. We gathered design features, including nicotine concentration, filter ventilation, and weight, from tobacco industry disclosures mandated by the Massachusetts Department of Public Health.

Results: In 2009, 52.7% of smokers self-reported light cigarette use, which accounted for 56.0% of cigarettes sold in the United States. Self-reported light smokers were more likely to be female, White, older, and nondaily smokers. Of design features analyzed, only average filter ventilation differed significantly between light and "full-flavored" cigarettes.

Conclusions: Assessment of the impact of the descriptors ban and any future policies surrounding light cigarettes should use multiple surveillance strategies, including measures of population use, sales, and cigarette design.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

FIGURE 1—
FIGURE 1—
Market share of light cigarettes: AC Nielsen ScanTrack, 2009.
See this image and copyright information in PMC

Similar articles

See all similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention Smoking-attributable mortality, years of potential life lost, and productivity losses—United States, 2000-2004. MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep. 2008;57(45):1226–1228 - PubMed
    1. US Department of Health, Education, and Welfare Smoking and Health: Report of the Advisory Committee to the Surgeon General of the Public Health Service. Washington, DC: US Department of Health, Education and Welfare, Public Health Service; 1964. Public Health Service Pub. No. 1103
    1. National Cancer Institute Risks Associated With Smoking Cigarettes With Low Machine-Measured Yields of Tar and Nicotine. Bethesda, MD: US Department of Health and Human Services, National Institutes of Health, National Cancer Institute; October 2001. Smoking and Tobacco Control Monograph No. 13. NIH Pub. No. 02-5074
    1. Cohen JB. Consumer/smoker perceptions of Federal Trade Commission tar ratings. : The FTC Cigarette Test Method for Determining Tar, Nicotine, and Carbon Monoxide Yields of U.S. Cigarettes. Report of the NCI Expert Committee. Rockville, MD: US Department of Health and Human Services, National Institutes of Health, National Cancer Institute; 1996:. Smoking and Tobacco Control Monograph No. 7. NIH Pub. No. 96-4028
    1. Cohen JB. Smokers’ knowledge and understanding of advertised tar numbers: health policy implications. Am J Public Health. 1996;86(1):18–24 - PMC - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources