New strategies for the evaluation of the nadir bone marrow following induction in acute myeloid leukemia
- PMID: 23328452
- DOI: 10.1097/MOH.0b013e32835d8207
New strategies for the evaluation of the nadir bone marrow following induction in acute myeloid leukemia
Abstract
Purpose of review: Patients with acute myeloid leukemia (AML) routinely undergo a bone marrow biopsy 7-10 days after induction chemotherapy to evaluate treatment effectiveness. Measuring blast count by morphology alone has been the standard hematopathologic technique. Although helpful to guide future treatment decisions, the early bone marrow does not predict well which patients will achieve complete remission, and ultimately be cured. New methods of assessing early treatment effectiveness are being developed. This review summarizes the current utility of early bone marrow evaluations and looks toward future developments.
Recent findings: More sensitive techniques than light microscopy are available to analyze the presence or absence of leukemia after treatment. These include flow-cytometry and polymerase chain reaction-based assays, and their use is playing a larger role in monitoring therapy effectiveness after induction and during consolidation. Importantly, novel techniques including enzymatic amplification staining (performed on bone marrow samples) and noninvasive molecular imaging have been studied and may play a role in future therapy asessment.
Summary: Identifying and implementing new tools to measure therapy effectiveness will be an important component of improving outcomes for patients with AML.
Similar articles
-
A method comparison study of flow cytometry and cytomorphology to determine the percentages of blasts in patients with acute leukemia after induction and consolidation chemotherapy.J Med Assoc Thai. 2010 Jan;93 Suppl 1:S157-64. J Med Assoc Thai. 2010. PMID: 20364570
-
Is a nadir bone marrow required and, if so, what to do with residual disease?Best Pract Res Clin Haematol. 2011 Dec;24(4):527-32. doi: 10.1016/j.beha.2011.09.009. Epub 2011 Nov 4. Best Pract Res Clin Haematol. 2011. PMID: 22127316 Review.
-
Increased myeloid precursors in regenerating bone marrow; implications for detection of minimal residual disease in acute myeloid leukemia.Neoplasma. 2007;54(6):471-7. Neoplasma. 2007. PMID: 17949229
-
Current and emerging therapies for acute myeloid leukemia.Clin Ther. 2009;31 Pt 2:2349-70. doi: 10.1016/j.clinthera.2009.11.017. Clin Ther. 2009. PMID: 20110045 Review.
-
Is the D14 bone marrow in acute myeloid leukemia still the gold standard?Curr Opin Hematol. 2016 Mar;23(2):108-14. doi: 10.1097/MOH.0000000000000214. Curr Opin Hematol. 2016. PMID: 26717195 Review.
Cited by
-
Are patients open to elective re-sampling of their glioblastoma? A new way of assessing treatment innovations.Acta Neurochir (Wien). 2014 Oct;156(10):1855-62; discussion 1862-3. doi: 10.1007/s00701-014-2189-3. Epub 2014 Aug 2. Acta Neurochir (Wien). 2014. PMID: 25085543 Free PMC article.
-
Early assessment of response to induction therapy in acute myeloid leukemia using 18F-FLT PET/CT.EJNMMI Res. 2017 Sep 16;7(1):75. doi: 10.1186/s13550-017-0326-8. EJNMMI Res. 2017. PMID: 28916904 Free PMC article.
-
Re-induction therapy in adult patients with acute myeloid leukemia with ≤20 % blasts: A retrospective cohort study.Leuk Res. 2021 Dec;111:106731. doi: 10.1016/j.leukres.2021.106731. Epub 2021 Oct 21. Leuk Res. 2021. PMID: 34695644 Free PMC article. No abstract available.
-
Multi-color flow cytometric immunophenotyping for detection of minimal residual disease in AML: past, present and future.Bone Marrow Transplant. 2014 Sep;49(9):1129-38. doi: 10.1038/bmt.2014.99. Epub 2014 May 19. Bone Marrow Transplant. 2014. PMID: 24842529 Review.
-
Value of routine 'day 14' marrow exam in newly diagnosed AML.Leukemia. 2015 Jan;29(1):247-9. doi: 10.1038/leu.2014.268. Epub 2014 Sep 10. Leukemia. 2015. PMID: 25204570 No abstract available.
Publication types
MeSH terms
Substances
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources
Medical
Research Materials