Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2013 Jan;6(1):64-71.
doi: 10.1016/j.jcmg.2012.07.017.

Magnetic resonance measurement of turbulent kinetic energy for the estimation of irreversible pressure loss in aortic stenosis

Affiliations

Magnetic resonance measurement of turbulent kinetic energy for the estimation of irreversible pressure loss in aortic stenosis

Petter Dyverfeldt et al. JACC Cardiovasc Imaging. 2013 Jan.

Abstract

Objectives: The authors sought to measure the turbulent kinetic energy (TKE) in the ascending aorta of patients with aortic stenosis and to assess its relationship to irreversible pressure loss.

Background: Irreversible pressure loss caused by energy dissipation in post-stenotic flow is an important determinant of the hemodynamic significance of aortic stenosis. The simplified Bernoulli equation used to estimate pressure gradients often misclassifies the ventricular overload caused by aortic stenosis. The current gold standard for estimation of irreversible pressure loss is catheterization, but this method is rarely used due to its invasiveness. Post-stenotic pressure loss is largely caused by dissipation of turbulent kinetic energy into heat. Recent developments in magnetic resonance flow imaging permit noninvasive estimation of TKE.

Methods: The study was approved by the local ethics review board and all subjects gave written informed consent. Three-dimensional cine magnetic resonance flow imaging was used to measure TKE in 18 subjects (4 normal volunteers, 14 patients with aortic stenosis with and without dilation). For each subject, the peak total TKE in the ascending aorta was compared with a pressure loss index. The pressure loss index was based on a previously validated theory relating pressure loss to measures obtainable by echocardiography.

Results: The total TKE did not appear to be related to global flow patterns visualized based on magnetic resonance-measured velocity fields. The TKE was significantly higher in patients with aortic stenosis than in normal volunteers (p < 0.001). The peak total TKE in the ascending aorta was strongly correlated to index pressure loss (R(2) = 0.91).

Conclusions: Peak total TKE in the ascending aorta correlated strongly with irreversible pressure loss estimated by a well-established method. Direct measurement of TKE by magnetic resonance flow imaging may, with further validation, be used to estimate irreversible pressure loss in aortic stenosis.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1. Total TKE in the Ascending Aorta Over Time
Plots of the total turbulent kinetic energy (TKEtotal) in the ascending aorta over time (time after R-peak) for normal volunteers (dotted lines) and patients with aortic stenosis (solid lines). Subjects are ordered according to peak total TKE along the second horizontal axis. The peak total TKE in the aortic stenosis patients was significantly higher than in the normal volunteers, p < 0.001.
Figure 2
Figure 2. Visualization of Flow Patterns and TKE
Visualization of flow patterns and turbulent kinetic energy (TKE) in 1 normal volunteer and 3 patients with aortic stenosis. For each subject, volume renderings of TKE (red to yellow color scale) at the time point of peak total TKE have been combined with streamline visualization of the instantaneous velocity field at the time of peak velocity (blue color scale). Color settings were the same in all subjects.
Figure 3
Figure 3. Total TKE Versus Pressure Loss
Total turbulent kinetic energy (TKEtotal) in the ascending aorta plotted against index pressure loss (iPL). The total TKE was obtained by integrating the TKE per unit volume across the entire ascending aorta. The iPL was calculated based on formulas validated by Garcia et al. (12,13). Total TKE was strongly correlated with iPL (R2 = 0.91).

References

    1. Hatle L, Angelsen BA, Tromsdal A. Non-invasive assessment of aortic stenosis by Doppler ultrasound. Br Heart J. 1980;43:284–292. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Ohlsson J, Wranne B. Noninvasive assessment of valve area in patients with aortic stenosis. J Am Coll Cardiol. 1986;7:501–508. - PubMed
    1. Laskey WK, Kussmaul WG. Pressure recovery in aortic valve stenosis. Circulation. 1994;89:116–121. - PubMed
    1. Schobel WA, Voelker W, Haase KK, Karsch KR. Extent, determiants and clinical importance of pressure recovery in patients with aortic valve stenosis. Eur Heart J. 1999;20:1355–1363. - PubMed
    1. Gjertsson P, Caidahl K, Svensson G, Wallentin I, Bech-Hanssen O. Important pressure recovery in patients with aortic stenosis and high Doppler gradients. Am J Cardiol. 2001;88:139–144. - PubMed

Publication types