Treatment of lateral epicondylitis with platelet-rich plasma, glucocorticoid, or saline: a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial
- PMID: 23328738
- DOI: 10.1177/0363546512472975
Treatment of lateral epicondylitis with platelet-rich plasma, glucocorticoid, or saline: a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial
Abstract
Background: Lateral epicondylitis (LE) is a common musculoskeletal disorder for which an effective treatment strategy remains unknown.
Purpose: To examine whether a single injection of platelet-rich plasma (PRP) is more effective than placebo (saline) or glucocorticoid in reducing pain in adults with LE after 3 months.
Study design: Randomized controlled trial; Level of evidence, 1.
Methods: A total of 60 patients with chronic LE were randomized (1:1:1) to receive either a blinded injection of PRP, saline, or glucocorticoid. The primary end point was a change in pain using the Patient-Rated Tennis Elbow Evaluation (PRTEE) questionnaire at 3 months. Secondary outcomes were ultrasonographic changes in tendon thickness and color Doppler activity.
Results: Pain reduction at 3 months (primary end point) was observed in all 3 groups, with no statistically significant difference between the groups; mean differences were the following: glucocorticoid versus saline: -3.8 (95% CI, -9.9 to 2.4); PRP versus saline: -2.7 (95% CI, -8.8 to 3.5); and glucocorticoid versus PRP: -1.1 (95% CI, -7.2 to 5.0). At 1 month, however, glucocorticoid reduced pain more effectively than did both saline and PRP; mean differences were the following: glucocorticoid versus saline: -8.1 (95% CI, -14.3 to -1.9); and glucocorticoid versus PRP: -9.3 (95% CI, -15.4 to -3.2). Among the secondary outcomes, at 3 months, glucocorticoid was more effective than PRP and saline in reducing color Doppler activity and tendon thickness. For color Doppler activity, mean differences were the following: glucocorticoid versus PRP: -2.6 (95% CI, -3.1 to -2.2); and glucocorticoid versus saline: -2.0 (95% CI, -2.5 to -1.6). For tendon thickness, mean differences were the following: glucocorticoid versus PRP: -0.5 (95% CI, -0.8 to -0.2); and glucocorticoid versus saline: -0.8 (95% CI, -1.2 to -0.5).
Conclusion: Neither injection of PRP nor glucocorticoid was superior to saline with regard to pain reduction in LE at the primary end point at 3 months. However, injection of glucocorticoid had a short-term pain-reducing effect at 1 month in contrast to the other therapies. Injection of glucocorticoid in LE reduces both color Doppler activity and tendon thickness compared with PRP and saline.
Comment in
-
Platelet-rich plasma treatment for lateral epicondylitis: letter to the editor.Am J Sports Med. 2013 Jul;41(7):NP33-4. doi: 10.1177/0363546513493767. Am J Sports Med. 2013. PMID: 23818440 No abstract available.
-
Authors' response.Am J Sports Med. 2013 Jul;41(7):NP34-5. Am J Sports Med. 2013. PMID: 23977676 No abstract available.
-
How effective are injection treatments for lateral epicondylitis?Clin J Sport Med. 2013 Nov;23(6):502-3. doi: 10.1097/JSM.0000000000000042. Clin J Sport Med. 2013. PMID: 24169302
-
An injection of platelet-rich plasma, glucocorticoid, or saline solution produced similar pain and disability results in lateral epicondylitis.J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2013 Nov 20;95(22):2059. doi: 10.2106/JBJS.9522.ebo915. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2013. PMID: 24257667 No abstract available.
Publication types
MeSH terms
Substances
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources
Medical
Research Materials
