Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2013 Feb 5;108(2):271-7.
doi: 10.1038/bjc.2012.598. Epub 2013 Jan 17.

Prognostic value of Ki-67 for prostate cancer death in a conservatively managed cohort

Affiliations

Prognostic value of Ki-67 for prostate cancer death in a conservatively managed cohort

G Fisher et al. Br J Cancer. .

Abstract

Background: Standard clinical parameters cannot accurately differentiate indolent from aggressive prostate cancer. Our previous work showed that immunohistochemical (IHC) Ki-67 improved prediction of prostate cancer death in a cohort of conservatively treated clinically localised prostate cancers diagnosed by transurethral resection of the prostate (TURP). Here, we present results in a more clinically relevant needle biopsy cohort.

Methods: Biopsy specimens were microarrayed. The percentage of Ki-67 positively stained malignant cells per core was measured and the maximum score per individual used in analysis of time to death from prostate cancer using a Cox proportional hazards model.

Results: In univariate analysis (n=293), the hazard ratio (HR) (95% confidence intervals) for dichotomous Ki-67 (≤ 10%, >10%) was 3.42 (1.76, 6.62) χ(2) (1 df)=9.8, P=0.002. In multivariate analysis, Ki-67 added significant predictive information to that provided by Gleason score and prostate-specific antigen (HR=2.78 (1.42, 5.46), χ(2) (1 df)=7.0, P=0.008).

Conclusion: The IHC Ki-67 scoring on prostate needle biopsies is practicable and yielded significant prognostic information. It was less informative than in the previous TURP cohort where tumour samples were larger and more comprehensive, but in more contemporary cohorts with larger numbers of biopsies per patient, Ki-67 may prove a more powerful biomarker.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Hazard ratio for Ki-67 in multivariate analysis after adjustment for covariates, in the existing literature, for (A) prostate cancer-specific survival (I-squared=7.5%, P=0.371) and (B) prostate cancer recurrence (I-squared=61.9%, P=0.007). The area of the box is proportional to the amount of information available, and the horizontal bars represent 95% confidence intervals.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Consort diagram: overview of cohort.
Figure 3
Figure 3
Distribution of Ki-67 score, in diagnostic needle biopsy tissue from a conservatively managed cohort of 293 men.
Figure 4
Figure 4
Kaplan–Meier estimates of prostate cancer death according to Ki-67 score in three groups: different categories of Ki-67 score are shown by different lines: solid, ⩽5% dotted, >5 to ⩽10% dashed, >10%.
Figure 5
Figure 5
Hazard ratio for prostate cancer mortality for Ki-67 score (⩽10%, >10%) within different clinical subgroups of Gleason score and prostate-specific antigen (PSA). The area of the box is proportional to the amount of information available and the horizontal bars represent 95% confidence intervals. The lowest Gleason group (<7) and PSA group (⩽4 ng ml−1) were omitted because there was only one observation in each of these groups.

References

    1. Berney DM, Gopalan A, Kudahetti S, Fisher G, Ambroisine L, Foster CS, Reuter V, Eastham J, Moller H, Kattan MW, Gerald W, Cooper C, Scardino P, Cuzick J. Ki-67 and outcome in clinically localised prostate cancer: analysis of conservatively treated prostate cancer patients from the Trans-Atlantic Prostate Group study. Br J Cancer. 2009;100 (6:888–893. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Cowen D, Troncoso P, Khoo VS, Zagars GK, von Eschenbach AC, Meistrich ML, Pollack A. Ki-67 staining is an independent correlate of biochemical failure in prostate cancer treated with radiotherapy. Clin Cancer Res. 2002;8 (5:1148–1154. - PubMed
    1. Cuzick J, Berney DM, Fisher G, Mesher D, Møller H, Reid JE, Perry M, Park J, Younus A, Gutin A, Foster CS, Scardino P, Lanchbury JS, Stone S, on behalf of the Transatlantic Prostate Group Prognostic value of a cell cycle progression signature for prostate cancer death in a conservatively managed needle biopsy cohort. Br J Cancer. 2012;106:1095–1099. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Cuzick J, Fisher G, Kattan MW, Berney D, Oliver T, Foster CS, Møller H, Reuter V, Fearn P, Eastham J, Scardino P, Transatlantic Prostate Group Long-term outcome among men with conservatively treated localised prostate cancer. Br J Cancer. 2006;95:1186–1194. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Cuzick J, Swanson GP, Fisher G, Brothman AR, Berney DM, Reid JE, Mesher D, Speights VO, Stankiewicz E, Foster CS, Møller H, Scardino P, Warren JD, Park J, Younus A, Flake DD, Wagner S, Gutin A, Lanchbury JS, Stone S, Transatlantic Prostate Group Prognostic value of an RNA expression signature derived from cell cycle proliferation genes in patients with prostate cancer: a retrospective study. Lancet Oncol. 2011;12 (3:245–255. - PMC - PubMed

Publication types