Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Comparative Study
. 2013 Apr;37(4):806-11.
doi: 10.1007/s00268-013-1912-1.

Validation of the laparoscopically stapled approach as a standard technique for left lateral segment liver resection

Affiliations
Comparative Study

Validation of the laparoscopically stapled approach as a standard technique for left lateral segment liver resection

Xuedong Wang et al. World J Surg. 2013 Apr.

Abstract

Background: Left lateral sectionectomy (LLS) is the most common type of anatomic laparoscopic liver resection performed, accounting for 20 % of all laparoscopic hepatectomies. Because there has been no standardized surgical technique for laparoscopic left lateral sectionectomy (LLLS), we offer an established operation: laparoscopically stapled left lateral sectionectomy (LSLLS). Our aim was to perform a case-controlled study of LSLLS with traditional (without vascular staplers) laparoscopic left lateral sectionectomy (TLLLS), validating the standardization and reproducibility of LSLLS.

Methods: From February 2009 to December 2011, a total of 49 LSLLSs were performed. The results were compared with 33 cohort-matched TLLLSs from an earlier time period. Ordered sample cluster analysis was used to determine the learning curve of LSLLS based on the operating time and blood loss.

Results: All LSLLS were performed successfully. There were no conversions to laparotomy or hand-assisted laparoscopic resection. Two endoscopic linear staplers were used in each case. Despite a higher hospital cost ($10,892 ± $944 vs. $8,962 ± $943, p < 0.05), LSLLS compared favorably with TLLLS regarding operating time (103 ± 21 vs. 151 ± 32 min, p < 0.05) and blood loss (70.8 ± 41.6 vs. 173.3 ± 131.1 ml, p < 0.05). No specific complications related to laparoscopy were observed. Ordered sample cluster analysis demonstrated a learning curve of 18 cases for LSLLS.

Conclusions: This study demonstrates the standardization and reproducibility of LSLLS. We therefore propose LSLLS as the standard technique for lesions located in the left lateral section of the liver.

PubMed Disclaimer

References

    1. Eur J Surg Oncol. 2008 Dec;34(12):1285-8 - PubMed
    1. J Hepatobiliary Pancreat Surg. 2006;13(2):149-54 - PubMed
    1. Anesth Analg. 2003 Feb;96(2):351-5, table of contents - PubMed
    1. Am J Surg. 1989 Nov;158(5):459-60 - PubMed
    1. J Am Coll Surg. 2003 Feb;196(2):236-42 - PubMed

MeSH terms

LinkOut - more resources