Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2013 Feb;31(2):111-23.
doi: 10.1007/s40273-012-0015-4.

Acknowledging patient heterogeneity in economic evaluation : a systematic literature review

Affiliations

Acknowledging patient heterogeneity in economic evaluation : a systematic literature review

Janneke P C Grutters et al. Pharmacoeconomics. 2013 Feb.

Abstract

Background and objective: Patient heterogeneity is the part of variability that can be explained by certain patient characteristics (e.g. age, disease stage). Population reimbursement decisions that acknowledge patient heterogeneity could potentially save money and increase population health. To date, however, economic evaluations pay only limited attention to patient heterogeneity. The objective of the present paper is to provide a comprehensive overview of the current knowledge regarding patient heterogeneity within economic evaluation of healthcare programmes.

Methods: A systematic literature review was performed to identify methodological papers on the topic of patient heterogeneity in economic evaluation. Data were obtained using a keyword search of the PubMed database and manual searches. Handbooks were also included. Relevant data were extracted regarding potential sources of patient heterogeneity, in which of the input parameters of an economic evaluation these occur, methods to acknowledge patient heterogeneity and specific concerns associated with this acknowledgement.

Results: A total of 20 articles and five handbooks were included. The relevant sources of patient heterogeneity (demographics, preferences and clinical characteristics) and the input parameters where they occurred (baseline risk, treatment effect, health state utility and resource utilization) were combined in a framework. Methods were derived for the design, analysis and presentation phases of an economic evaluation. Concerns related mainly to the danger of false-positive results and equity issues.

Conclusion: By systematically reviewing current knowledge regarding patient heterogeneity within economic evaluations of healthcare programmes, we provide guidance for future economic evaluations. Guidance is provided on which sources of patient heterogeneity to consider, how to acknowledge them in economic evaluation and potential concerns. The improved acknowledgement of patient heterogeneity in future economic evaluations may well improve the efficiency of healthcare.

PubMed Disclaimer

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Stat Med. 2002 Oct 15;21(19):2917-30 - PubMed
    1. Trials. 2009 Nov 09;10:101 - PubMed
    1. Med Decis Making. 2003 Sep-Oct;23(5):379-96 - PubMed
    1. Nature. 2004 May 27;429(6990):464-8 - PubMed
    1. Ann Intern Med. 1992 Jan 1;116(1):78-84 - PubMed

Publication types

LinkOut - more resources