Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Case Reports
. 2013 Jan 17:2013:bcr2012007748.
doi: 10.1136/bcr-2012-007748.

Surgical-orthodontic management of bilateral multiple impactions in non-syndromic patient

Affiliations
Case Reports

Surgical-orthodontic management of bilateral multiple impactions in non-syndromic patient

Jiwanasha Manish Agrawal et al. BMJ Case Rep. .

Abstract

Several surgical and orthodontic treatment options are available to disimpact the impacted teeth. But the closed eruption technique has the best long-term prognosis. The tooth is surgically exposed, an attachment is bonded to it, flap is resutured over it and an orthodontic extrusive force is delivered to bring the tooth into occlusion. This case report presents a case with multiple impacted teeth in which no syndrome or systemic conditions were detected. A 20-year-old female patient reported for orthodontic treatment with chief complaint of multiple unerupted permanent teeth and retained primary teeth. Radiographic examination revealed impacted 14, 15, 24, 25, 33, 34, 43 and 44. Surgical exposure of the impacted teeth was done after extraction of retained primary teeth. Forced eruption of these teeth was done by applying traction with closed eruption technique. After careful treatment planning followed by guided eruption of impacted teeth, patient finished with a significantly improved functional and aesthetic result.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Pretreatment photographs.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Pretreatment radiographs.
Figure 3
Figure 3
Surgical exposure and placement of brackets on impacted 33, 34, 43 and 44.
Figure 4
Figure 4
Treatment progress.
Figure 5
Figure 5
Post-treatment photographs.
Figure 6
Figure 6
Post-treatment OPG.

Similar articles

References

    1. Andreasen JO, Pindborg JJ, Hjorting-Hansen E, et al. Oral health care: more than caries and periodontal disease. A survey of epidemiological studies on oral disease. Int Dent J 1986;36:207–14 - PubMed
    1. Shroff B. Canine impaction diagnosis, treatment planning, and clinical management. In: Nanda R.ed. Biomechanics in clinical orthodontics. Philadelphia: W.B. Saunders, 1997:99–108
    1. Bishara SE. Clinical management of impacted maxillary canines. Semin Orthod 1998;4:87–98 - PubMed
    1. Becker A, Sharabi S, Chaushu S. Maxillary tooth size variation in dentitions with palatal canine displacement. Eur J Orthod 2002;24:313–18 - PubMed
    1. Langberg BJ, Peck S. Adequacy of maxillary dental arch width in patients with palatally displaced canines. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 2000;118:220–3 - PubMed

Publication types