Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2015 Jun;18(3):392-405.
doi: 10.1111/hex.12044. Epub 2013 Jan 20.

The role of patients and their relatives in 'speaking up' about their own safety - a qualitative study of acute illness

Helen Rainey  1 , Kathryn Ehrich, Nicola Mackintosh, Jane Sandall
Affiliations

The role of patients and their relatives in 'speaking up' about their own safety - a qualitative study of acute illness

Helen Rainey et al. Health Expect. 2015 Jun.

Abstract

Background: Poor recognition of and response to acute illness in hospitalized patients continues to cause significant harm despite the implementation of safety strategies such as early warning scores. Patients and their relatives may be able to contribute to their own safety by speaking up about changes in condition, but little is known about the factors that influence this. This study examined the experiences and views of patients and their relatives to determine the potential for involvement in promoting their own safety.

Methods: This data set is drawn from a wider ethnographic study of the management of the acutely ill patient in hospital. Thirteen patients and seven relatives from two medical settings in two UK NHS Trusts were interviewed. Thematic analysis identified factors likely to influence patients' and their relatives' ability to contribute to the management of deterioration.

Results: All patients interviewed had experienced their acute illness within the context of a long-term health problem. Speaking up was influenced by the ability to recognize changes in clinical condition, self-monitoring, confidence and trust, and culture and system of health care. When patients or relatives did raise concerns, health-care staff had a mediating effect on their comfort with and the effectiveness of speaking up.

Implications: Safety strategies based on patient involvement must take account of the complexities of acute illness. Those that promote partnership may be more acceptable to patients, their families and staff than those that promote challenging behaviour and may ultimately prove to be most safe and effective.

Keywords: acute illness; patient involvement; patient safety.

PubMed Disclaimer

References

    1. World Health Organisation . Patients for patient safety, 2009. Available at: http://www.who.int/patientsafety/patients_for_patient/en/, accessed April 2011.
    1. Vincent CA, Coulter A. Patient safety: what about the patient? Quality & Safety in Health Care, 2002; 11: 76–80. - PMC - PubMed
    1. The Joint Commission . Speak up, 2002. Available at: http://www.jointcommission.org/facts_about_speak_up_initiatives/, accessed October 2011.
    1. McGuckin M, Waterman R, Storr J et al Evaluation of a patient‐empowering hand hygiene programme in the UK. Journal of Hospital Infection, 2001; 48: 222–227. - PubMed
    1. DiGiovanni CW, Kang L, Manuel J. Patient compliance in avoiding wrong‐site surgery. Journal of Bone & Joint Surgery: American volume, 2003; 85‐A: 815–819. - PubMed

Publication types