Effectiveness of electronic fetal monitoring with additional ST analysis in vertex singleton pregnancies at >36 weeks of gestation: an individual participant data metaanalysis
- PMID: 23333546
- DOI: 10.1016/j.ajog.2013.01.028
Effectiveness of electronic fetal monitoring with additional ST analysis in vertex singleton pregnancies at >36 weeks of gestation: an individual participant data metaanalysis
Abstract
Objective: The purpose of this study was to assess the effectiveness of electronic fetal monitoring (EFM) alone and with additional ST analysis (EFM + ST) in laboring women with a singleton term pregnancy that is in cephalic presentation in the prevention of metabolic acidosis by the application of individual patient data metaanalysis.
Study design: We conducted an individual patient data metaanalysis using data from 4 randomized trials, which enabled us to account for missing data and investigate relevant subgroups. The primary outcome was metabolic acidosis, which was defined as an umbilical cord-artery pH <7.05 and a base deficit that had been calculated in the extra cellular fluid compartment >12 mmol/L. We performed 8 explanatory subgroup analyses for 8 different endpoints.
Results: We analyzed data from 12,987 women and their newborn infants. Metabolic acidosis was present in 57 women (0.9%) in the EFM + ST group and 73 women (1.1%) in the EFM alone group (relative risk [RR], 0.76; 95% CI, 0.53-1.10). Compared with EFM alone, the use of EFM + ST resulted in a reduction in the frequency of instrumental vaginal deliveries (RR, 0.90; 95% CI, 0.83-0.99) and fetal blood samples (RR, 0.49; 95% CI, 0.44-0.55). Cesarean delivery rates were comparable between both groups (RR, 0.99; 95% CI, 0.91-1.09). Subgroup analyses showed that EFM + ST resulted in fewer admissions to a neonatal intensive care unit for women with a duration of pregnancy of >41 weeks (RR, 0.61; 95% CI, 0.39-0.95).
Conclusion: EFM + ST does not reduce the risk of metabolic acidosis, but it does reduce the need for instrumental vaginal deliveries and fetal blood sampling.
Copyright © 2013 Mosby, Inc. All rights reserved.
Comment in
-
The search for an adequate back-up test for intrapartum fetal heart rate monitoring.Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2013 Mar;208(3):163-4. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2012.12.001. Epub 2012 Dec 13. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2013. PMID: 23246735 No abstract available.
-
Reply: To PMID 23333546.Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2013 Oct;209(4):394-5. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2013.05.014. Epub 2013 May 9. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2013. PMID: 23665246 No abstract available.
-
ST analysis reviewed.Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2013 Oct;209(4):394. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2013.05.013. Epub 2013 May 9. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2013. PMID: 23665247 No abstract available.
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources
Medical
