Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2013 Apr;15(4):847-61.
doi: 10.1093/ntr/nts336. Epub 2013 Jan 18.

Research priorities for FCTC Articles 20, 21, and 22: surveillance/evaluation and information exchange

Affiliations
Review

Research priorities for FCTC Articles 20, 21, and 22: surveillance/evaluation and information exchange

Gary A Giovino et al. Nicotine Tob Res. 2013 Apr.

Abstract

Introduction: Framework Convention on Tobacco Control (FCTC) Articles 20, 21, and 22 call for strong monitoring and reporting of tobacco use and factors influencing use and disease (Articles 20 and 21) and for collaboration among the Parties and relevant organizations to share resources, knowledge, and expertise on all relevant tobacco control strategies (Article 22).

Methods: This paper provides background information and discusses research strategies that would strengthen these efforts and better inform the parties. By necessity, Articles 20 and 21 are discussed separately from Article 22, although 1 example that relates to both 20/21 and 22 is discussed at the end.

Results: Twelve important research opportunities on surveillance and evaluation are recognized, along with 4 on collaboration. The authors believe that the 6 most important areas for research would study (a) possible underreporting of tobacco use among certain demographic groups in some countries, (b) measures of industry activities, (c) optimal sampling strategies, (d) sentinel surveillance, (e) networks of tobacco companies and their partners as they promote tobacco use and interfere with implementation of the FCTC, and (f) network/relationship factors that impact diffusion of knowledge and decision making on the implementation of the FCTC. In addition, we call for a review process of existing surveillance and evaluation strategies to coordinate activities to make optimal use of existing resources. This activity would involve networking as prescribed in Article 22.

Conclusions: Studies and activities such as these would facilitate control of the tobacco epidemic.

PubMed Disclaimer

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Agranoff R., McGuire M. (2003). Collaborative public management: New strategies for local governments. Washington, DC: Georgetown University Press;
    1. Alter C., Hage J. (1993). Organizations working together. Newbury Park, CA: Sage;
    1. Ayers J. W., Ribisl K., Brownstein J. S. (2011). Using search query surveillance to monitor tax avoidance and smoking cessation following the United States’ 2009 “SCHIP” cigarette tax Increase. PLoS One, 6, e16777 doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0016777 - PMC - PubMed
    1. Backinger C. L., Malarcher A. M. (2010). The things that get measured are the things that get done. American Journal of Preventive Medicine, 38, S433–S436 doi:10.1016/ j.amepre.2009.12.005 - PubMed
    1. Baker A., Ivers R. G., Bowman J., Butler T., Kay-Lambkin F. J., Wye P. … Wodak A. (2006). Where there’s smoke, there’s fire: High prevalence of smoking among some sub-populations and recommendations for intervention. Drug and Alcohol Review, 25, 85–96 doi:10.1080/09595230500459552 - PubMed

Publication types