Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2013 Oct 3;168(3):2008-13.
doi: 10.1016/j.ijcard.2012.12.086. Epub 2013 Jan 19.

Fragmented QRS complexes are not hallmarks of myocardial injury as detected by cardiac magnetic resonance imaging in patients with acute myocardial infarction

Affiliations

Fragmented QRS complexes are not hallmarks of myocardial injury as detected by cardiac magnetic resonance imaging in patients with acute myocardial infarction

Min-Soo Ahn et al. Int J Cardiol. .

Abstract

Background: Q waves on a 12-lead electrocardiography (ECG) are considered to be classic hallmarks of prior myocardial infarction. However, one study suggested that the fragmented QRS complex (fQRS) on ECG is a highly sensitive and specific marker of myocardial scarring on a nuclear stress test. The study aimed to investigate the diagnostic accuracy of fragmented QRS complexes compared with Q waves for myocardial injury detected by delayed contrast-enhanced cardiovascular magnetic resonance imaging (DE-CMRI) in subjects with acute myocardial infarction.

Methods: Electrocardiograms of 190 subjects with myocardial infarction who underwent DE-CMR were analyzed. fQRS was defined by the presence of an additional R wave (R″), or notching of the S wave, or more than one R' in two contiguous leads.

Results: Delayed enhancement was observed in 180 (94.7%) patients. Transmural enhancement was noted in 78 (43.3%) and subendocardial enhancement in 102 (56.7%) patients. The sensitivity and specificity of Q waved and fQRS for diagnosing delayed enhancement were 59.4% vs. 66.7% and 90.0% vs. 40.0%. The area under the receiver-operator characteristics curve of delayed enhancement was 0.75 for Q waves and 0.53 for fQRS (p=0.04). The areas under the ROC curves of the transmurality of delayed enhancement were 0.44 for fQRS and 0.58 for Q waves (p=0.73).

Conclusions: fQRS has poor accuracy for the detection of myocardial injury compared with Q waves. fQRS and Q waves are not valuable tools for the diagnosis transmural irreversible myocardial injury in acute myocardial infarction.

Keywords: Electrocardiography; Magnetic resonance imaging; Myocardial infarction.

PubMed Disclaimer

Publication types

LinkOut - more resources