Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2013 Jan-Feb;19(1):50-8.
doi: 10.1097/PPO.0b013e31828160a9.

Demystifying immunotherapy in prostate cancer: understanding current and future treatment strategies

Affiliations

Demystifying immunotherapy in prostate cancer: understanding current and future treatment strategies

Ravi A Madan et al. Cancer J. 2013 Jan-Feb.

Abstract

Immunotherapy has emerged as a viable therapeutic option for patients with prostate cancer. There are multiple potential strategies that use the immune system, including therapeutic cancer vaccines that are designed to stimulate immune cells to target antigens expressed by cancer cells. Sipuleucel-T is a vaccine currently approved for the treatment of minimally symptomatic metastatic prostate cancer, whereas the vaccine PSA-TRICOM and the immune-checkpoint inhibitor ipilimumab are in phase III testing. Although there are no short-term changes in disease progression or available biomarkers to assess response, these agents appear to improve survival. One hypothesis suggests that this apparent paradox can be explained by the growth-moderating effects of these treatments, which do not cause tumor size to diminish, but rather stall or slow their growth rate over time. For this reason, the use of immunotherapy earlier in the disease process is being investigated. Another approach is to block immune-regulatory mechanisms mediated by the molecules cytotoxic T lymphocyte antigen 4 and programmed cell death protein 1. Additional future strategies will combine immunotherapy with other standard therapies, potentially enhancing the latter's clinical impact and thereby improving both time to progression and overall survival due to the combined effects of both treatments. Prospective trials are currently evaluating these hypotheses and will ultimately serve to optimize immunotherapy in the treatment of prostate cancer.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Conflicts of Interest/Source of Funding:

Ravi A. Madan: none

James L. Gulley: none

Philip W. Kantoff: Paid consultant to Dendreon, Bavarian Nordic Immunotherapeutics and to Bristol Myers Squibb

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Bostwick DG, Pacelli A, Blute M, et al. Prostate specific membrane antigen expression in prostatic intraepithelial neoplasia and adenocarcinoma: a study of 184 cases. Cancer. 1998;82:2256–2261. - PubMed
    1. Goldfarb DA, Stein BS, Shamszadeh M, et al. Age-related changes in tissue levels of prostatic acid phosphatase and prostate specific antigen. J Urol. 1986;136:1266–9. - PubMed
    1. Wang MC, Valenzuela LA, Murphy GP, et al. Purification of a human prostate specific antigen. Invest Urol. 1979;17:159–63. - PubMed
    1. Chakraborty NG, Stevens RL, Mehrotra S, et al. Recognition of PSA-derived peptide antigens by T cells from prostate cancer patients without any prior stimulation. Cancer Immunol Immunother. 2003;52:497–505. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Sharifi N, Gulley JL, Dahut WL. Androgen deprivation therapy for prostate cancer. JAMA. 2005;294:238–44. - PubMed