Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2013 Apr;37(2):9905.
doi: 10.1007/s10916-012-9905-4. Epub 2013 Jan 23.

Closing the feedback loop: an interactive voice response system to provide follow-up and feedback in primary care settings

Affiliations

Closing the feedback loop: an interactive voice response system to provide follow-up and feedback in primary care settings

James H Willig et al. J Med Syst. 2013 Apr.

Abstract

In primary care settings, follow-up regarding the outcome of acute outpatient visits is largely absent. We sought to develop an automated interactive voice response system (IVRS) for patient follow-up with feedback to providers capable of interfacing with multiple pre-existing electronic medical records (EMRs). A system was designed to extract data from EMRs, integrate with the IVRS, call patients for follow-up, and provide a feedback report to providers. Challenges during the development process were analyzed and summarized. The components of the technological solution and details of its implementation are reported. Lessons learned include: (1) Modular utilization of system components is often needed to adapt to specific clinic workflow and patient population needs (2) Understanding the local telephony environment greatly impacts development and is critical to success, and (3) Ample time for development of the IVRS questionnaire (mapping all branching paths) and speech recognition tuning (sensitivity, use of barge-in tuning, use of "known voice") is needed. With proper attention to design and development, modular follow-up and feedback systems can be integrated into existing EMR systems providing the benefits of IVRS follow-up to patients and providers across diverse practice settings.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
Workflow for automated feedback loop
Fig. 2
Fig. 2
Overall schematic of data collection and data sharing between project components

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Fewer bells and whistles, but IVR (interactive voice response) gets the job done. Dis. Manag. Advis. 2001;7(9):129–133. [No authors listed] - PubMed
    1. Abu-Hasaballah K, James A, Aseltine RH., Jr. Lessons and pitfalls of interactive voice response in medical research. Contemp. Clin. Trials. 2007;28(5):593–602. - PubMed
    1. Oake N, Jennings A, van Walraven C, Forster AJ. Interactive voice response systems for improving delivery of ambulatory care. Am. J. Manag. Care. 2009;15(6):383–391. - PubMed
    1. Pierce G. IVR (interactive voice response) me ASAP. Four hot applications of interactive voice response. Healthc. Inform. 1998;15(2):147–148. 150, 152. - PubMed
    1. Schroder KE, Johnson CJ. Interactive voice response technology to measure HIV-related behavior. Curr. HIV/AIDS Rep. 2009;6(4):210–216. - PubMed

Publication types

LinkOut - more resources