Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Randomized Controlled Trial
. 2013 Apr;36(4):858-64.
doi: 10.2337/dc12-1668. Epub 2013 Jan 22.

The efficacy and safety of insulin degludec given in variable once-daily dosing intervals compared with insulin glargine and insulin degludec dosed at the same time daily: a 26-week, randomized, open-label, parallel-group, treat-to-target trial in individuals with type 2 diabetes

Affiliations
Randomized Controlled Trial

The efficacy and safety of insulin degludec given in variable once-daily dosing intervals compared with insulin glargine and insulin degludec dosed at the same time daily: a 26-week, randomized, open-label, parallel-group, treat-to-target trial in individuals with type 2 diabetes

Luigi Meneghini et al. Diabetes Care. 2013 Apr.

Abstract

Objective: The requirement to inject current basal insulin analogs at a fixed time each day may complicate adherence and compromise glycemic control. This trial evaluated the efficacy and safety of varying the daily injection time of insulin degludec (IDeg), an ultra-long-acting basal insulin.

Research design and methods: This 26-week, open-label, treat-to-target trial enrolled adults (≥18 years) with type 2 diabetes who were either insulin naïve and receiving oral antidiabetic drugs (OADs) (HbA(1c) = 7-11%) or previously on basal insulin ± OAD(s) (HbA(1c) = 7-10%). Participants were randomized to 1) once-daily (OD) IDeg in a prespecified dosing schedule, creating 8-40-h intervals between injections (IDeg OD Flex; n = 229); 2) once-daily IDeg at the main evening meal (IDeg OD; n = 228); or 3) once-daily insulin glargine at the same time each day (IGlar OD; n = 230). The primary outcome was noninferiority of IDeg OD Flex to IGlar OD in HbA(1c) reduction after 26 weeks.

Results: After 26 weeks, IDeg OD Flex, IDeg OD, and IGlar OD improved HbA(1c) by 1.28, 1.07, and 1.26% points, respectively (estimated treatment difference [IDeg OD Flex - IGlar OD]: 0.04% points [-0.12 to 0.20], confirming noninferiority). No statistically significant differences in overall or nocturnal hypoglycemia were found between IDeg OD Flex and IGlar OD. Comparable glycemic control and rates of hypoglycemia were seen with IDeg OD Flex and IDeg OD. Adverse event profiles were similar across groups.

Conclusions: The use of extreme dosing intervals of 8-40 h demonstrates that the daily injection time of IDeg can be varied without compromising glycemic control or safety.

Trial registration: ClinicalTrials.gov NCT01006291.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Dosing schedule for IDeg OD Flex treatment group. *, defined as the period from waking up until first meal of the day; †, defined as the period from start of evening meal until bedtime. A 24-h interval was introduced between Saturday and Sunday evening doses to ensure an equal number of short (8–12 h) and long (36–40 h) intervals during the week.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Glycemic efficacy and cumulative nocturnal hypoglycemia. A: Mean HbA1c (±SEM) over time. B: Mean FPG (±SEM) over time. C: Mean 9-point SMPG profiles at baseline (dashed lines) and week 26 (full lines). D: Cumulative mean number of nocturnal hypoglycemic episodes per participant. For A and B, data are observed mean values for all randomized participants (last observation carried forward is used for each postbaseline time point). Plasma-calibrated values are shown in C. Nocturnal confirmed hypoglycemia, confirmed hypoglycemia with an onset between 00:01 h and 05:59 h (inclusive).

References

    1. International Diabetes Federation Diabetes Atlas. 5th ed. Brussels, Belgium, International Diabetes Federation, 2011
    1. Nathan DM, Buse JB, Davidson MB, et al. American Diabetes Association. European Association for Study of Diabetes Medical management of hyperglycemia in type 2 diabetes: a consensus algorithm for the initiation and adjustment of therapy: a consensus statement of the American Diabetes Association and the European Association for the Study of Diabetes. Diabetes Care 2009;32:193–203 - PMC - PubMed
    1. Inzucchi SE, Bergenstal RM, Buse JB, et al. Management of hyperglycaemia in type 2 diabetes: a patient-centered approach. Position statement of the American Diabetes Association (ADA) and the European Association for the Study of Diabetes (EASD). Diabetologia 2012;55:1577–1596 - PubMed
    1. Rodbard HW, Jellinger PS, Davidson JA, et al. Statement by an American Association of Clinical Endocrinologists/American College of Endocrinology consensus panel on type 2 diabetes mellitus: an algorithm for glycemic control. Endocr Pract 2009;15:540–559 - PubMed
    1. Lantus. European Public Assessment Report, Annex I: summary of product characteristics [Internet]. Available from http://www.ema.europa.eu/docs/en_GB/document_library/EPAR_-_Product_Info... Accessed 17 October 2011

Publication types

Associated data