Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Meta-Analysis
. 2013;8(1):e53346.
doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0053346. Epub 2013 Jan 14.

Measuring unsafe abortion-related mortality: a systematic review of the existing methods

Affiliations
Meta-Analysis

Measuring unsafe abortion-related mortality: a systematic review of the existing methods

Caitlin Gerdts et al. PLoS One. 2013.

Abstract

Background: The WHO estimates that 13% of maternal mortality is due to unsafe abortion, but challenges with measurement and data quality persist. To our knowledge, no systematic assessment of the validity of studies reporting estimates of abortion-related mortality exists.

Study design: To be included in this study, articles had to meet the following criteria: (1) published between September 1(st), 2000-December 1(st), 2011; (2) utilized data from a country where abortion is "considered unsafe"; (3) specified and enumerated causes of maternal death including "abortion"; (4) enumerated ≥100 maternal deaths; (5) a quantitative research study; (6) published in a peer-reviewed journal.

Results: 7,438 articles were initially identified. Thirty-six studies were ultimately included. Overall, studies rated "Very Good" found the highest estimates of abortion related mortality (median 16%, range 1-27.4%). Studies rated "Very Poor" found the lowest overall proportion of abortion related deaths (median: 2%, range 1.3-9.4%).

Conclusions: Improvements in the quality of data collection would facilitate better understanding global abortion-related mortality. Until improved data exist, better reporting of study procedures and standardization of the definition of abortion and abortion-related mortality should be encouraged.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Competing Interests: The authors have declared that no competing interests exist.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1. Depicts the search strategy for this review.
7,438 articles were initially identified. After excluding all duplicate titles, and reviewing titles and abstracts, the full text of 92 articles were reviewed for possible inclusion. Of those articles whose full text was reviewed, 56 did not meet inclusion criteria. The total number of studies included in the review was thirty-six.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. WHO (2010) Unsafe abortion: global and regional estimates of the incidence of unsafe abortion and associated mortality in 2008. WHO, Geneva, Switzerland.
    1. AbouZahr C (2011) New estimates of maternal mortality and how to interpret them: choice or confusion? Reprod Health Matters 19(37): 117–128. - PubMed
    1. Ahman E, Shah I (2011) New estimates and trends regarding unsafe abortion mortality. International J Gynecol & Obstet 115(2): 121–126. - PubMed
    1. AbouZahr C (2006) Global burden of maternal death and disability. Br Med Bull 67: 1–11. - PubMed
    1. Graham W, Ahmed S, Stanton C, Abou-Zahr C, Campbell O (2008) Measuring maternal mortality: an overview of opportunities and options for developing countries. BMC Medicine 6(1): 12. - PMC - PubMed

Publication types