Germline DNA copy number aberrations identified as potential prognostic factors for breast cancer recurrence
- PMID: 23342018
- PMCID: PMC3547038
- DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0053850
Germline DNA copy number aberrations identified as potential prognostic factors for breast cancer recurrence
Abstract
Breast cancer recurrence (BCR) is a common treatment outcome despite curative-intent primary treatment of non-metastatic breast cancer. Currently used prognostic and predictive factors utilize tumor-based markers, and are not optimal determinants of risk of BCR. Germline-based copy number aberrations (CNAs) have not been evaluated as determinants of predisposition to experience BCR. In this study, we accessed germline DNA from 369 female breast cancer subjects who received curative-intent primary treatment following diagnosis. Of these, 155 experienced BCR and 214 did not, after a median duration of follow up after breast cancer diagnosis of 6.35 years (range = 0.60-21.78) and 8.60 years (range = 3.08-13.57), respectively. Whole genome CNA genotyping was performed on the Affymetrix SNP array 6.0 platform. CNAs were identified using the SNP-Fast Adaptive States Segmentation Technique 2 algorithm implemented in Nexus Copy Number 6.0. Six samples were removed due to poor quality scores, leaving 363 samples for further analysis. We identified 18,561 CNAs with ≥1 kb as a predefined cut-off for observed aberrations. Univariate survival analyses (log-rank tests) identified seven CNAs (two copy number gains and five copy neutral-loss of heterozygosities, CN-LOHs) showing significant differences (P<2.01×10(-5)) in recurrence-free survival (RFS) probabilities with and without CNAs.We also observed three additional but distinct CN-LOHs showing significant differences in RFS probabilities (P<2.86×10(-5)) when analyses were restricted to stratified cases (luminal A, n = 208) only. After adjusting for tumor stage and grade in multivariate analyses (Cox proportional hazards models), all the CNAs remained strongly associated with the phenotype of BCR. Of these, we confirmed three CNAs at 17q11.2, 11q13.1 and 6q24.1 in representative samples using independent genotyping platforms. Our results suggest further investigations on the potential use of germline DNA variations as prognostic markers in cancer-associated phenotypes.
Conflict of interest statement
Figures




Similar articles
-
Distinguishing somatic and germline copy number events in cancer patient DNA hybridized to whole-genome SNP genotyping arrays.Methods Mol Biol. 2013;973:355-72. doi: 10.1007/978-1-62703-281-0_22. Methods Mol Biol. 2013. PMID: 23412801
-
Integrated analysis of copy number alteration and RNA expression profiles of cancer using a high-resolution whole-genome oligonucleotide array.Exp Mol Med. 2009 Jul 31;41(7):462-70. doi: 10.3858/emm.2009.41.7.051. Exp Mol Med. 2009. PMID: 19322034 Free PMC article.
-
Prediction of early-stage hepatocellular carcinoma using OncoScan chromosomal copy number aberration data.World J Gastroenterol. 2017 Nov 28;23(44):7818-7829. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v23.i44.7818. World J Gastroenterol. 2017. PMID: 29209123 Free PMC article.
-
Copy number alterations: a catastrophic orchestration of the breast cancer genome.Trends Mol Med. 2024 Aug;30(8):750-764. doi: 10.1016/j.molmed.2024.04.017. Epub 2024 May 20. Trends Mol Med. 2024. PMID: 38772764 Review.
-
Insights into the Clinical, Biological and Therapeutic Impact of Copy Number Alteration in Cancer.Int J Mol Sci. 2024 Jun 21;25(13):6815. doi: 10.3390/ijms25136815. Int J Mol Sci. 2024. PMID: 38999925 Free PMC article. Review.
Cited by
-
Somatic gene copy number alterations in colorectal cancer: new quest for cancer drivers and biomarkers.Oncogene. 2016 Apr 21;35(16):2011-9. doi: 10.1038/onc.2015.304. Epub 2015 Aug 10. Oncogene. 2016. PMID: 26257062 Review.
-
Sparse canonical correlation to identify breast cancer related genes regulated by copy number aberrations.PLoS One. 2022 Dec 30;17(12):e0276886. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0276886. eCollection 2022. PLoS One. 2022. PMID: 36584096 Free PMC article.
-
Autocrine and paracrine STIP1 signaling promote osteolytic bone metastasis in renal cell carcinoma.Oncotarget. 2017 Mar 7;8(10):17012-17026. doi: 10.18632/oncotarget.15222. Oncotarget. 2017. PMID: 28199984 Free PMC article.
-
Next generation sequencing profiling identifies miR-574-3p and miR-660-5p as potential novel prognostic markers for breast cancer.BMC Genomics. 2015 Sep 29;16:735. doi: 10.1186/s12864-015-1899-0. BMC Genomics. 2015. PMID: 26416693 Free PMC article.
-
Germline copy number variations are associated with breast cancer risk and prognosis.Sci Rep. 2017 Nov 7;7(1):14621. doi: 10.1038/s41598-017-14799-7. Sci Rep. 2017. PMID: 29116104 Free PMC article.
References
-
- Siegel R, Naishadham D, Jemal A (2012) Cancer statistics, 2012. CA Cancer J Clin 62: 10–29. - PubMed
-
- Canadian Cancer Society’s Steering Committee on Cancer Statistics (2011) Canadian Cancer Statistics 2011. Toronto, ON: Canadian Cancer Society.
-
- Early Breast Cancer Trialists' Collaborative Group (EBCTCG) (2005) Effects of chemotherapy and hormonal therapy for early breast cancer on recurrence and 15-year survival: An overview of the randomised trials. Lancet 365: 1687–1717. - PubMed
-
- Weigel MT, Dowsett M (2010) Current and emerging biomarkers in breast cancer: Prognosis and prediction.EndocrRelat Cancer. 17: R245–62. - PubMed
-
- van der Leij F, Elkhuizen PH, Bartelink H, van de VijverMJ (2012) Predictive factors for local recurrence in breast cancer. SeminRadiatOncol 22: 100–107. - PubMed
Publication types
MeSH terms
Grants and funding
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources
Medical