Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2013;8(1):e53868.
doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0053868. Epub 2013 Jan 16.

Cigarette experimentation and the population attributable fraction for associated genetic and non-genetic risk factors

Affiliations

Cigarette experimentation and the population attributable fraction for associated genetic and non-genetic risk factors

Anna V Wilkinson et al. PLoS One. 2013.

Abstract

Background: We, and others, have shown that experimenting with cigarettes is a function of both non-genetic and genetic factors. In this analysis we ask: how much of the total risk of experimenting with cigarettes, among those who had not experimented with cigarettes when they enrolled in a prospective cohort, is attributable to genetic factors and to non-genetic factors?

Methods: Participants (N = 1,118 Mexican origin youth), recruited from a large population-based cohort study in Houston, Texas, provided prospective data on cigarette experimentation over three years. Non-genetic data were elicited twice - baseline and follow-up. Participants were genotyped for 672 functional and tagging variants in the dopamine, serotonin and opioid pathways.

Results: In the overall model, the adjusted combined non-genetic PAF was 71.2% and the adjusted combined genetic PAF was 58.5%. Among committed never smokers the adjusted combined non-genetic PAF was 67.0% and the adjusted combined genetic PAF was 53.5%. However, among cognitively susceptible youth, the adjusted combined non-genetic PAF was 52.0% and the adjusted combined genetic PAF was 68.4%.

Conclusions: Our results suggest there may be differences in genotypes between youth who think they will try cigarettes in the future compared to their peers who think they will not and underscore the possibility that the relative influence of genetic vs. non-genetic factors on the uptake of smoking may vary between these two groups of youth.

Impact: A clearer understanding of the relative role of genetic vs. non-genetic factors in the uptake of smoking may have implications for the design of prevention programs.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Competing Interests: The authors have declared that no competing interests exist.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1. Estimated PAFs for non-genetic and genetic risk factors associated with cigarette experimentation, overall and by cognitive susceptibility status.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. U.S. Department of Health and Human Services (2012) Preventing tobacco use among youth and young adults: a report of the Surgeon General. Atlanta: Department of Health and Human Services, Public Health Service, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, National Center for Chronic Disease Prevention and Health Promotion, Office on Smoking and Health.
    1. Wilkinson AV, Bondy ML, Etzel CJ, Wang J, Dong Q, et al. (2012) Cigarette Experimentation in Mexican Origin Youth: Psychosocial & Genetic Determinants. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev 21: 228–38. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Spelman AR, Spitz MR, Kelder SH, Prokhorov AV, Bondy ML, et al. (2009) Cognitive susceptibility to smoking: Two paths to experimenting among Mexican origin youth. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev 18: 3459–67. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Jackson C (1998) Cognitive susceptibility to smoking and initiation of smoking during childhood: A longitudinal study. Prev Med 27: 129–134. - PubMed
    1. Pierce JP, Choi WS, Gilpin EA, Farkas AJ, Merritt RK (1996) Validation of susceptibility as a predictor of which adolescents take up smoking in the United States. Health Psychol 1996 15: 355–361. - PubMed

Publication types