Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2012 Dec;12(6):505-12.
doi: 10.7861/clinmedicine.12-6-505.

Prevalence of use of complementary and alternative medicine (CAM) by physicians in the UK: a systematic review of surveys

Paul Posadzki  1 , Amani Alotaibi, Edzard Ernst
Affiliations

Prevalence of use of complementary and alternative medicine (CAM) by physicians in the UK: a systematic review of surveys

Paul Posadzki et al. Clin Med (Lond). 2012 Dec.

Abstract

This systematic review aims to estimate the prevalence of use of complementary and alternative medicine (CAM) by physicians in the UK. Five databases were searched for surveys monitoring the prevalence of use of CAM, which were published between 1 January 1995 and 7 December 2011. In total, 14 papers that reported 13 separate surveys met our inclusion criteria. Most were of poor methodological quality. The average prevalence of use of CAM across all surveys was 20.6% (range 12.1-32%). The average referral rate to CAM was 39% (range 24.6-86%), and CAM was recommended by 46% of physicians (range 38-55%). The average percentage of physicians who had received training in CAM was 10.3% (range 4.8-21%). The three most commonly used methods of CAM were acupuncture, homeopathy and relaxation therapy. A sizable proportion of physicians in the UK seem to employ some type of CAM, yet many have not received any training in CAM. This raises issues related to medical ethics, professional competence and education of physicians.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Fig 1.
Fig 1.
Study flow diagram.
Fig 2.
Fig 2.
Changes over time in physicians’ use of complementary and alternative medicine (CAM) (only surveys of use of CAM in general).
Fig 3.
Fig 3.
Changes over time in physicians’ referral to complementary and alternative medicine (CAM) (only surveys of use of CAM in general).
See this image and copyright information in PMC

Similar articles

See all similar articles

Cited by

See all "Cited by" articles

References

    1. Ernst E. Pittler MH. Wider B. Boddy K. The desktop guide to complementary and alternative medicine. 2nd edn. Edinburgh: Elsevier Mosby; 2006.
    1. Lewith GT. Hyland M. Gray SF. Attitudes to and use of complementary medicine among physicians in the United Kingdom. Complement Ther Med. 2001;9:167–72. doi: 10.1054/ctim.2001.0475. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Ernst E. Resch KL. White AR. Complementary medicine. What physicians think of it: a meta-analysis. Arch Intern Med. 1995;155:2405–8. doi: 10.1001/archinte.155.22.2405. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Ekins-Daukes S. Helms PJ. Taylor MW, et al. Paediatric homoeopathy in general practice: where, when and why? Br J Clin Pharmacol. 2005;59:743–9. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2125.2004.02213.x. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Fewell F. Mackrodt K. Awareness and practice of complementary therapies in hospital and community settings within Essex in the United Kingdom. Complement Ther Clin Pract. 2005;11:130–6. doi: 10.1016/j.ctnm.2004.08.005. - DOI - PubMed

Publication types

MeSH terms