Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2013 Jan 23;2(1):1.
doi: 10.1186/2045-4015-2-1.

The effect of clinical interventions on hospital readmissions: a meta-review of published meta-analyses

Affiliations

The effect of clinical interventions on hospital readmissions: a meta-review of published meta-analyses

Jochanan Benbassat et al. Isr J Health Policy Res. .

Abstract

Background: The economic impact and ease of measurement of all-cause hospital readmission rates (HRR) have led to the current debate as to whether they are reducible, and whether they should be used as a publicly reported quality indicators of medical care.

Objective: To assess the efficacy of broad clinical interventions in preventing HRR of patients with chronic diseases

Method: A meta-review of published systematic reviews of randomized controlled trials (RCTs) of clinical interventions that have included HRR among the patients' outcomes of interest.

Main findings: Meta-analyses of RCTs have consistently found that, in the community, disease management programs significantly reduced HRR in patients with heart failure, coronary heart disease and bronchial asthma, but not in patients with stroke and in unselected patients with chronic disorders. Inhospital interventions, such as discharge planning, pharmacological consultations and multidisciplinary care, and community interventions in patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary diseases had an inconsistent effect on HRR. MAIN STUDY LIMITATION: Despite their economic impact and ease of measurement, HRR are not the most important outcome of patient care, and efforts aimed at their reduction may compromise patients' health by reducing also justified re-admissions.

Conclusions: The efficacy of inhospital interventions in reducing HRR is in need of further study. In patients with heart diseases and bronchial asthma, HRR may be considered as a publicly reported quality indicator of community care, provided that future research confirms that efforts to reduce HRR do not adversely affect other patients' outcomes, such as mortality, functional capacity and quality of life. Future research should also focus on the reasons for the higher efficacy of community interventions in patients with heart diseases and bronchial asthma than in those with other chronic diseases.

PubMed Disclaimer

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Joynt KE, Jha AK. Thirty-Day Readmissions — Truth and Consequences. N Engl J Med. 2012;366:1366–1369. doi: 10.1056/NEJMp1201598. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Camberg LC, Smith NE, Beaudet M, Daley J, Cagan M, Thibault G. Discharge destination and repeat hospitalizations. Medical Care. 1997;35:756–767. doi: 10.1097/00005650-199708000-00002. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Hasan O, Meltzer DO, Shaykevich SA, Bell CM, Kaboli PJ, Auerbach AD, Wetterneck TB, Arora VM, Zhang J, Schnipper JL. Hospital readmission in general medicine patients: a prediction model. J Gen Intern Med. 2010;25:211–219. doi: 10.1007/s11606-009-1196-1. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Goldfield NI, McCullough EC, Hughes JS, Tang AM, Eastman B, Rawlins LK, Averill RF. Identifying potentially preventable readmissions. Health Care Financ Rev. 2008;30:75–91. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Ashton CM, Del Junco DJ, Souchek S, Wray NP, Mansyur CL. The association between quality of inpatient care and early readmission. A meta-analysis of the evidence. Med Care. 1997;35:1044–1059. doi: 10.1097/00005650-199710000-00006. - DOI - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources