Pharmaceutical R&D performance by firm size: approval success rates and economic returns
- PMID: 23344103
- DOI: 10.1097/MJT.0b013e318269198f
Pharmaceutical R&D performance by firm size: approval success rates and economic returns
Abstract
The R&D productivity of pharmaceutical firms has become an increasingly significant concern of industry, regulators, and policymakers. To address an important aspect of R&D performance, public and private data sources were used to estimate clinical phase transition and clinical approval probabilities for the pipelines of the 50 largest pharmaceutical firms (by sales) by 3 firms size groups (top 10 firms, top 11-20 firms, and top 21-50 firms). For self-originated compounds, the clinical approval success rates were 14.3%, 16.4%, and 18.4% for top 10 firms, top 11-20 firms, and top 21-50 firms, respectively. The results showing higher success rates for smaller firms were largely driven by outcomes for the small-molecule drugs. Adjustments for the relatively small differences in therapeutic class distributions across the firm size groups showed that the success rate for small-molecule self-originated drugs was 6% below average for top 10 firms and 17% above average for top 21-50 firms. Although success rates for small firms were higher, this advantage was offset to some degree by lower returns on approved drugs, suggesting different strategic objectives with regard to risk and reward by firm size.
Similar articles
-
Trends in risks associated with new drug development: success rates for investigational drugs.Clin Pharmacol Ther. 2010 Mar;87(3):272-7. doi: 10.1038/clpt.2009.295. Epub 2010 Feb 3. Clin Pharmacol Ther. 2010. PMID: 20130567 Review.
-
Productivity in pharmaceutical-biotechnology R&D: the role of experience and alliances.J Health Econ. 2005 Mar;24(2):317-39. doi: 10.1016/j.jhealeco.2004.09.006. Epub 2005 Jan 25. J Health Econ. 2005. PMID: 15721048
-
Overcoming the obstacles in the pharma/biotech industry: 2008 update.Drug News Perspect. 2009 Jan-Feb;22(1):39-51. doi: 10.1358/dnp.2009.22.1.1303817. Drug News Perspect. 2009. PMID: 19209298
-
Returns on research and development for 1990s new drug introductions.Pharmacoeconomics. 2002;20 Suppl 3:11-29. doi: 10.2165/00019053-200220003-00002. Pharmacoeconomics. 2002. PMID: 12457422
-
Does R&D pay?Drug Discov Today. 2010 Mar;15(5-6):230-4. doi: 10.1016/j.drudis.2009.11.002. Epub 2009 Nov 30. Drug Discov Today. 2010. PMID: 19931643 Review.
Cited by
-
Determinants of biopharmaceutical R&D expenditures in China: the impact of spatiotemporal context.Scientometrics. 2021;126(8):6659-6680. doi: 10.1007/s11192-021-04058-y. Epub 2021 Jun 23. Scientometrics. 2021. PMID: 34188331 Free PMC article.
-
Maximizing the value of phase III trials in immuno-oncology: A checklist from the Society for Immunotherapy of Cancer (SITC).J Immunother Cancer. 2022 Sep;10(9):e005413. doi: 10.1136/jitc-2022-005413. J Immunother Cancer. 2022. PMID: 36175037 Free PMC article.
-
Considerations for applying bioethics norms to a biopharmaceutical industry setting.BMC Med Ethics. 2021 Mar 25;22(1):31. doi: 10.1186/s12910-021-00600-y. BMC Med Ethics. 2021. PMID: 33766013 Free PMC article.
-
R&D implementation in a department of laboratory medicine and pathology: a systematic review based on pharmaceutical companies.Glob J Health Sci. 2015 Jan 1;7(4):70-82. doi: 10.5539/gjhs.v7n4p70. Glob J Health Sci. 2015. PMID: 25946935 Free PMC article.
-
Brief Overview of Approaches and Challenges in New Antibiotic Development: A Focus On Drug Repurposing.Front Cell Infect Microbiol. 2021 May 17;11:684515. doi: 10.3389/fcimb.2021.684515. eCollection 2021. Front Cell Infect Microbiol. 2021. PMID: 34079770 Free PMC article. Review.
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources