Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2013 Jan;28(1):54-61.
doi: 10.3904/kjim.2013.28.1.54. Epub 2012 Dec 28.

Rectal hyposensitivity and functional anorectal outlet obstruction are common entities in patients with functional constipation but are not significantly associated

Affiliations

Rectal hyposensitivity and functional anorectal outlet obstruction are common entities in patients with functional constipation but are not significantly associated

Tae Hee Lee et al. Korean J Intern Med. 2013 Jan.

Abstract

Background/aims: The causes of functional anorectal outlet obstruction (outlet obstruction) include functional defecation disorder (FDD), rectocele, and rectal intussusception (RI). It is unclear whether outlet obstruction is associated with rectal hyposensitivity (RH) in patients with functional constipation (FC). The aim of this study was to determine the association between RH and outlet obstruction in patients with FC.

Methods: This was a retrospective study using a prospectively collected constipation database, and the population comprised 107 patients with FC (100 females; median age, 49 years). We performed anorectal manometry, defecography, rectal barostat, and at least two tests (balloon expulsion test, electromyography, or colon transit time study). RH was defined as one or more sensory threshold pressures raised beyond the normal range on rectal barostat. We investigated the association between the presence of RH and an outlet obstruction such as large rectocele (> 2 cm in size), RI, or FDD.

Results: Forty patients (37.4%) had RH. No significant difference was observed in RH between patients with small and large rectoceles (22 [44.9%] vs. 18 [31%], respectively; p = 0.140). No significant difference was observed in RH between the non-RI and RI groups (36 [36.7%] vs. 4 [30.8%], respectively; p = 0.599). Furthermore, no significant difference in RH was observed between the non-FDD and FDD groups (19 [35.8%] vs. 21 [38.9%], respectively; p = 0.745).

Conclusions: RH and outlet obstruction are common entities but appear not to be significantly associated.

Keywords: Functional defecation disorder; Intussusception; Rectal hyposensitivity; Rectocele.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

No potential conflict of interest relevant to this article is reported.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Potential risk factors for rectal hyposensitivity in patients with functional constipation.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Shorvon PJ, McHugh S, Diamant NE, Somers S, Stevenson GW. Defecography in normal volunteers: results and implications. Gut. 1989;30:1737–1749. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Muller-Lissner S. The difficult patient with constipation. Best Pract Res Clin Gastroenterol. 2007;21:473–484. - PubMed
    1. Gladman MA, Lunniss PJ, Scott SM, Swash M. Rectal hyposensitivity. Am J Gastroenterol. 2006;101:1140–1151. - PubMed
    1. Kiff ES, Barnes PR, Swash M. Evidence of pudendal neuropathy in patients with perineal descent and chronic straining at stool. Gut. 1984;25:1279–1282. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Solana A, Roig JV, Villoslada C, Hinojosa J, Lledo S. Anorectal sensitivity in patients with obstructed defaecation. Int J Colorectal Dis. 1996;11:65–70. - PubMed

MeSH terms

LinkOut - more resources