Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2012:2012:780842.
doi: 10.1100/2012/780842. Epub 2012 Dec 30.

VATS lobectomy: surgical evolution from conventional VATS to uniportal approach

Affiliations

VATS lobectomy: surgical evolution from conventional VATS to uniportal approach

Diego Gonzalez-Rivas. ScientificWorldJournal. 2012.

Abstract

There is no standardized technique for the VATS lobectomy, though most centres use 2 ports and add a utility incision. However, the procedure can be performed by eliminating the two small ports and using only the utility incision with similar outcomes. Since 2010, when the uniportal approach was introduced for major pulmonary resection, the technique has been spreading worldwide. The single-port technique provides a direct view to the target tissue. The conventional triple port triangulation creates a new optical plane with genesis of dihedral or torsional angle that is not favorable with standard two-dimension monitors. The parallel instrumentation achieved during single-port approach mimics inside the maneuvers performed during open surgery. Furthermore, it represents the less invasive approach possible, and avoiding the use of trocar, we minimize the compression of the intercostal nerve. Further development of new technologies like sealing devices for all vessels and fissure, robotic arms that open inside the thorax, and wireless cameras will facilitate the uniportal approach to become the standard surgical procedure for pulmonary resection in most thoracic departments.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Postoperative result of single incision.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Surgeons in front of the patient.
Figure 3
Figure 3
Surgical instrumentation.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Cao C, Manganas C, Ang SC, Yan TD. A meta-analysis of unmatched and matched patients comparing video-assisted thoracoscopic lobectomy and conventional open lobectomy. Annals of Cardiothoracic Surgery. 2012;1(1):16–23. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Lewis RJ, Caccavale RJ. Video-assisted thoracic surgical non-rib spreading simultaneously stapled lobectomy (VATS(n)SSL) Seminars in Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery. 1998;10(4):332–339. - PubMed
    1. Landreneau RJ, Mack MJ, Hazelrigg SR, et al. Video-assisted thoracic surgery: basic technical concepts and intercostal approach strategies. Annals of Thoracic Surgery. 1992;54(4):800–807. - PubMed
    1. Roviaro G, Rebuffat C, Varoli F, Vergani C, Mariani C, Maciocco M. Videoendoscopic pulmonary lobectomy for cancer. Surgical Laparoscopy and Endoscopy. 1992;2(3):244–247. - PubMed
    1. Gossot D, Girard P, Raynaud C, et al. Totally endoscopic major pulmonary resection for stage I bronchial carcinoma: initial results. Revue des Maladies Respiratoires. 2009;26(9):961–970. - PubMed

MeSH terms