Factors Associated with Re-excision after Breast-Conserving Surgery for Early-Stage Breast Cancer
- PMID: 23346170
- PMCID: PMC3542849
- DOI: 10.4048/jbc.2012.15.4.412
Factors Associated with Re-excision after Breast-Conserving Surgery for Early-Stage Breast Cancer
Abstract
Purpose: Re-excisions after breast-conserving surgery (BCS) for breast cancer cause delays in the adjuvant treatment, increased morbidity, and leads to poor aesthetic results. Thus, efforts to reduce the re-excision rate are essential. This study aimed to conclusively determine the re-excision rate and the factors associated with re-excision after BCS.
Methods: We retrospectively reviewed the medical records and pathological reports of 711 cases that underwent BCS for early-stage breast cancer. Univariate and multivariate analyses were performed.
Results: Of the 711 cases of BCS, 71 (10.0%) required re-excision. Patients in the re-excision group were younger than those in the no re-excision group. Non-palpable lesions, the presence of non-mass-like enhancement at magnetic resonance imaging, multifocality, the presence of a ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS) component, and an infiltrative tumor border were also significantly associated with re-excision. Multivariate analysis indicated that younger age, non-palpable lesions, multifocal lesions, and the presence of a DCIS component were factors which were independently associated with re-excision. Tumors located in the lower inner quadrant had a relatively high involved resection margin rate as well as a narrow resection margin width, especially at the superior and medial margins. Lateral margins showed a tendency toward a wider resection margin width.
Conclusion: At our institution, the rate of re-excision was low despite the lack of an intraoperative frozen section. Patients with non-palpable or multifocal tumors, a DCIS component, or those who were younger than 50 years were more likely to require re-excision after BCS. These factors should be considered when planning surgical management of early-stage breast cancer. Positive resection margin rates and margin widths differed on a directional basis based on tumor location, and these differences were considerable.
Keywords: Breast neoplasms; Safety of margin; Segmental mastectomy.
Conflict of interest statement
The authors declare that they have no competing interests.
References
-
- Fisher B, Anderson S, Bryant J, Margolese RG, Deutsch M, Fisher ER, et al. Twenty-year follow-up of a randomized trial comparing total mastectomy, lumpectomy, and lumpectomy plus irradiation for the treatment of invasive breast cancer. N Engl J Med. 2002;347:1233–1241. - PubMed
-
- Veronesi U, Cascinelli N, Mariani L, Greco M, Saccozzi R, Luini A, et al. Twenty-year follow-up of a randomized study comparing breast-conserving surgery with radical mastectomy for early breast cancer. N Engl J Med. 2002;347:1227–1232. - PubMed
-
- Ahn SH, Yoo KY Korean Breast Cancer Society. Chronological changes of clinical characteristics in 31,115 new breast cancer patients among Koreans during 1996-2004. Breast Cancer Res Treat. 2006;99:209–214. - PubMed
-
- Kang E, Han SA, Kim S, Kim SM, Jang M, Lee HE, et al. Five-years of breast cancer management in a new hospital: analysis using clinical data warehouse. J Breast Cancer. 2010;13:96–103.
-
- Singletary SE. Surgical margins in patients with early-stage breast cancer treated with breast conservation therapy. Am J Surg. 2002;184:383–393. - PubMed
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources