Integration of robotics into two established programs of minimally invasive surgery for endometrial cancer appears to decrease surgical complications
- PMID: 23346310
- PMCID: PMC3549503
- DOI: 10.3802/jgo.2013.24.1.21
Integration of robotics into two established programs of minimally invasive surgery for endometrial cancer appears to decrease surgical complications
Abstract
Objective: To compare peri- and postoperative outcomes and complications of laparoscopic vs. robotic-assisted surgical staging for women with endometrial cancer at two established academic institutions.
Methods: Retrospective chart review of all women that underwent total hysterectomy with pelvic and para-aortic lymphadenectomy by robotic-assisted or laparoscopic approach over a four-year period by three surgeons at two academic institutions. Intraoperative and postoperative complications were measured. Secondary outcomes included operative time, blood loss, transfusion rate, number of lymph nodes retrieved, length of hospital stay and need for re-operation or re-admission.
Results: Four hundred and thirty-two cases were identified: 187 patients with robotic-assisted and 245 with laparoscopic staging. Both groups were statistically comparable in baseline characteristics. The overall rate of intraoperative complications was similar in both groups (1.6% vs. 2.9%, p=0.525) but the rate of urinary tract injuries was statistically higher in the laparoscopic group (2.9% vs. 0%, p=0.020). Patients in the robotic group had shorter hospital stay (1.96 days vs. 2.45 days, p=0.016) but an average 57 minutes longer surgery than the laparoscopic group (218 vs. 161 minutes, p=0.0001). There was less conversion rate (0.5% vs. 4.1%; relative risk, 0.21; 95% confidence interval, 0.03 to 1.34; p=0.027) and estimated blood loss in the robotic than in the laparoscopic group (187 mL vs. 110 mL, p=0.0001). There were no significant differences in blood transfusion rate, number of lymph nodes retrieved, re-operation or re-admission between the two groups.
Conclusion: Robotic-assisted surgery is an acceptable alternative to laparoscopy for staging of endometrial cancer and, in selected patients, it appears to have lower risk of urinary tract injury.
Keywords: Endometrial neoplasms; Laparoscopic surgery; Robotics.
Conflict of interest statement
Linus Chuang, MD is a consultant for Intuitive Surgical and Herbert Gretz, MD is a proctor for Intuitive Surgical and consultant for Ethicon.
Similar articles
-
Surgical outcomes of robotic-assisted surgical staging for endometrial cancer are equivalent to traditional laparoscopic staging at a minimally invasive surgical center.Gynecol Oncol. 2010 May;117(2):224-8. doi: 10.1016/j.ygyno.2010.01.009. Epub 2010 Feb 7. Gynecol Oncol. 2010. PMID: 20144471 Free PMC article.
-
Learning curve and surgical outcome for robotic-assisted hysterectomy with lymphadenectomy: case-matched controlled comparison with laparoscopy and laparotomy for treatment of endometrial cancer.J Minim Invasive Gynecol. 2010 Nov-Dec;17(6):739-48. doi: 10.1016/j.jmig.2010.07.008. J Minim Invasive Gynecol. 2010. PMID: 20955983
-
Classification of Postoperative Complications in Robotic-assisted Compared With Laparoscopic Hysterectomy for Endometrial Cancer.J Minim Invasive Gynecol. 2016 Nov-Dec;23(7):1181-1188. doi: 10.1016/j.jmig.2016.08.832. Epub 2016 Sep 9. J Minim Invasive Gynecol. 2016. PMID: 27621195
-
[Comparison of robotic surgery with laparoscopy for surgical staging of endometrial cancer: a meta-analysis].Zhonghua Fu Chan Ke Za Zhi. 2017 Mar 25;52(3):175-183. doi: 10.3760/cma.j.issn.0529-567X.2017.03.007. Zhonghua Fu Chan Ke Za Zhi. 2017. PMID: 28355689 Review. Chinese.
-
New technologies for reproductive medicine: laparoscopy, endoscopy, robotic surgery and gynecology. A review of the literature.Minerva Ginecol. 2010 Apr;62(2):137-67. Minerva Ginecol. 2010. PMID: 20502426 Review.
Cited by
-
Clinical comparison of robotic, laparoscopic, and open hysterectomy procedures for endometrial cancer patients.J Robot Surg. 2017 Sep;11(3):291-297. doi: 10.1007/s11701-016-0651-3. Epub 2016 Nov 3. J Robot Surg. 2017. PMID: 27812904
-
Contemporary clinical management of endometrial cancer.Obstet Gynecol Int. 2013;2013:583891. doi: 10.1155/2013/583891. Epub 2013 Jun 24. Obstet Gynecol Int. 2013. PMID: 23864861 Free PMC article.
-
Application of da Vinci(®) Robot in simple or radical hysterectomy: Tips and tricks.J Turk Ger Gynecol Assoc. 2016 Jan 12;17(2):106-9. doi: 10.5152/jtgga.2015.0156. eCollection 2016. J Turk Ger Gynecol Assoc. 2016. PMID: 27403078 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Implementation of a robotic surgical program in gynaecological oncology and comparison with prior laparoscopic series.Int J Surg Oncol. 2015;2015:814315. doi: 10.1155/2015/814315. Epub 2015 Feb 15. Int J Surg Oncol. 2015. PMID: 25785195 Free PMC article. Clinical Trial.
-
Route of Surgery for Sentinel Node Biopsy in Endometrial Cancer: Laparoscopy Versus Robotics.J Clin Med. 2025 Jun 6;14(12):4013. doi: 10.3390/jcm14124013. J Clin Med. 2025. PMID: 40565759 Free PMC article.
References
-
- Jemal A, Siegel R, Xu J, Ward E. Cancer statistics, 2010. CA Cancer J Clin. 2010;60:277–300. - PubMed
-
- Childers JM, Brzechffa PR, Hatch KD, Surwit EA. Laparoscopically assisted surgical staging (LASS) of endometrial cancer. Gynecol Oncol. 1993;51:33–38. - PubMed
-
- Pasic RP, Rizzo JA, Fang H, Ross S, Moore M, Gunnarsson C. Comparing robot-assisted with conventional laparoscopic hysterectomy: impact on cost and clinical outcomes. J Minim Invasive Gynecol. 2010;17:730–738. - PubMed
-
- Lim PC, Kang E, Park DH. Learning curve and surgical outcome for robotic-assisted hysterectomy with lymphadenectomy: case-matched controlled comparison with laparoscopy and laparotomy for treatment of endometrial cancer. J Minim Invasive Gynecol. 2010;17:739–748. - PubMed
-
- Jung YW, Lee DW, Kim SW, Nam EJ, Kim JH, Kim JW, et al. Robot-assisted staging using three robotic arms for endometrial cancer: comparison to laparoscopy and laparotomy at a single institution. J Surg Oncol. 2010;101:116–121. - PubMed
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources