Discriminant analysis of urethral pressure profilometry data for the diagnosis of genuine stress incontinence

Abstract

Urethral pressure profilometry (UPP) has been advocated for the diagnosis of genuine stress incontinence (GSI) but no published data exist to define clearly the criteria of measurement that should be used. The aim of this study was to examine the value of UPP in the diagnosis of GSI. Data from 102 urodynamically normal women and 70 women with GSI were compared. Thirty UPP variables from the resting and stress profiles were examined. The urodynamic diagnosis was made on the basis of a pad test, uroflowmetry and videocystourethrography. Each UPP variable was examined singly and thereafter all the measurements were examined by discriminate analysis. The single most discriminatory UPP variable was 'area under the stress profile' but the overlap between normal and GSI patients was too great to allow the test to be used diagnostically. Discriminate analysis resulted in correct classification in 78% of cases. On the basis of these results, UPP is not an accurate test for the diagnosis of GSI.