Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2013 Jan 24;13(2):1435-66.
doi: 10.3390/s130201435.

Synthetic and bio-artificial tactile sensing: a review

Affiliations
Review

Synthetic and bio-artificial tactile sensing: a review

Chiara Lucarotti et al. Sensors (Basel). .

Abstract

This paper reviews the state of the art of artificial tactile sensing, with a particular focus on bio-hybrid and fully-biological approaches. To this aim, the study of physiology of the human sense of touch and of the coding mechanisms of tactile information is a significant starting point, which is briefly explored in this review. Then, the progress towards the development of an artificial sense of touch are investigated. Artificial tactile sensing is analysed with respect to the possible approaches to fabricate the outer interface layer: synthetic skin versus bio-artificial skin. With particular respect to the synthetic skin approach, a brief overview is provided on various technologies and transduction principles that can be integrated beneath the skin layer. Then, the main focus moves to approaches characterized by the use of bio-artificial skin as an outer layer of the artificial sensory system. Within this design solution for the skin, bio-hybrid and fully-biological tactile sensing systems are thoroughly presented: while significant results have been reported for the development of tissue engineered skins, the development of mechanotransduction units and their integration is a recent trend that is still lagging behind, therefore requiring research efforts and investments. In the last part of the paper, application domains and perspectives of the reviewed tactile sensing technologies are discussed.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1.
Figure 1.
Section of the glabrous human skin illustrating the main classes of mechanoreceptors, comprising SA I (Merkel cells), FA I (Meissner corpuscles), SA II (Ruffini endings) and FA II (Pacinian corpuscles) tactile units (also, see Table 1).
Figure 2.
Figure 2.
Classification of artificial tactile sensing with respect to the possible approaches to fabricate the outer interface skin layer and the transduction mechanism: synthetic versus bio-artificial.

References

    1. Scheibert J., Leurent S., Prevost A., Debrégeas G. The role of fingerprints in the coding of tactile information probed with a biomimetic sensor. Science. 2009;323:1503–1506. - PubMed
    1. Candelier R., Prevost A., Debrégeas G. The role of exploratory conditions in bio-inspired tactile sensing of single topogical features. Sensors. 2011;11:7934–7953. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Vasarhelyi G., Adam M., Vazsonyi E., Barsony I., Ducso C. Effects of the elastic cover on tactile sensor arrays. Sens. Actuators A Phys. 2006;132:245–251.
    1. Oddo C.M., Beccai L., Wessberg J., Wasling H.B., Mattioli F., Carrozza M.C. Roughness encoding in human and biomimetic artificial touch: Spatiotemporal frequency modulation and structural anisotropy of fingerprints. Sensors. 2011;11:5596–5615. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Johansson R.S., Flanagan J.R. Coding and use of tactile signals from the fingertips in object manipulation tasks. Nat. Rev. Neurosci. 2009;10:345–359. - PubMed

Publication types