Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2013 Apr;12(4):394-404.
doi: 10.1158/1535-7163.MCT-12-0648. Epub 2013 Jan 24.

Targeting IGF-IR with ganitumab inhibits tumorigenesis and increases durability of response to androgen-deprivation therapy in VCaP prostate cancer xenografts

Affiliations

Targeting IGF-IR with ganitumab inhibits tumorigenesis and increases durability of response to androgen-deprivation therapy in VCaP prostate cancer xenografts

Cale D Fahrenholtz et al. Mol Cancer Ther. 2013 Apr.

Abstract

Prostate cancer is the most commonly diagnosed malignancy in men. While tumors initially respond to androgen-deprivation therapy, the standard care for advanced or metastatic disease, tumors eventually recur as castration-resistant prostate cancer (CRPC). Upregulation of the insulin-like growth factor receptor type I (IGF-IR) signaling axis drives growth and progression of prostate cancer by promoting proliferation, survival, and angiogenesis. Ganitumab (formerly AMG 479) is a fully human antibody that inhibits binding of IGF-I and IGF-II to IGF-IR. We evaluated the therapeutic value of ganitumab in several preclinical settings including androgen-dependent prostate cancer, CRPC, and in combination with androgen-deprivation therapy. Ganitumab inhibited IGF-I-induced phosphorylation of the downstream effector AKT and reduced proliferation of multiple androgen-dependent and castration-resistant human prostate cancer cell lines in vitro. Ganitumab inhibited androgen-dependent VCaP xenograft growth and increased tumor-doubling time from 2.3 ± 0.4 weeks to 6.4 ± 0.4 weeks. Ganitumab blocked growth of castration-resistant VCaP xenografts for over 11.5 weeks of treatment. In contrast, ganitumab did not have appreciable effects on the castration-resistant CWR-22Rv1 xenograft model. Ganitumab was most potent against VCaP xenografts when combined with complete androgen-deprivation therapy (castration). Tumor volume was reduced by 72% after 4 weeks of treatment and growth suppression was maintained over 16 weeks of treatment. These data suggest that judicious use of ganitumab particularly in conjunction with androgen-deprivation therapy may be beneficial in the treatment of prostate cancer.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Disclosure of Potential Conflicts of Interest: Pedro J. Beltran is an employee of and owns stock in Amgen, Inc.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1. Analysis of ganitumab effects on IGF-1R signaling and prostate cancer cell proliferation in vitro.
VCaP and 22Rv1 were cultured in serum deprived media for 24 hours, and treated with ganitumab [0 nM, 10 nM, 100 nM, 1000 nM] for 90 minutes prior to treatment with 1nM IGF-1 for 30 minutes. Lysates were probed by western blot for phospho-AKT and total-AKT in VCaP (A) and 22Rv1 (B). The effects of seven day ganitumab treatment (0–1000 nM) on prostate cancer cell proliferation in 2% FBS containing media [(C), 22Rv1 (D), CWR-R1 (E), and LNCaP (F)] were determined. (G) VCaP, 22Rv1, CWR-R1 and LNCaP were cultured in medium containing 2%FBS for 72 hours with 500 nM ganitumab or control. Lysates were immunoblotted for cleaved PARP and actin. (C–E) are representative of at least 3 experiments performed in triplicate. (F) Represents 3 combined experiments. (G) is representative of 2 independent experiments. All data are shown ± SD. (*p<.05, **<.01, ***<.001, Two-tailed Student’s t-test)
Figure 2
Figure 2. Ganitumab inhibits the growth of androgen-dependent VCaP xenografts
VCaP xenografts were established in intact (androgen-replete) mice. When tumors reached an average volume of 260–320 mm3, treatment with ganitumab or control antibody was initiated. (A) Tumor volumes (mm3) are shown relative to treatment initiation (n=3–4 for control; n=4–8 for ganitumab). (B) Tumor doubling times for control and ganitumab treated mice are shown (n=4 for control; n=8 for ganitumab). (C) Serum PSA doubling times are shown (n=4 for control; n=8 for ganitumab). (D) Xenograft lysates were immunoblotted for IGF-1R, INSR, and actin for control-treated and ganitumab treated tumors. Western blots were quantified by densitometry and relative IGF-1R (E) and relative INSR (F) normalized to actin are shown. All data are displayed ± SEM. (*p<.05, **<.01, Two-tailed Student’s t-test)
Figure 3
Figure 3. Ganitumab inhibits the growth of castration-resistant VCaP xenografts
Castration-resistant VCaP xenografts were established and mice were treated with control antibody beginning one week after castration. Five weeks after castration with an average tumor volume of 538 mm3, mice were randomized into 2 groups and treatment with ganitumab was initiated (Control → Ganitumab) or control antibody was continued (Control → Control). (A) Tumor volumes (mm3) are shown relative to time of castration (n=4–5 for control; n=3–4 for ganitumab). (B) Serum PSA (ng/mL) levels are shown (n=18 for pre-treatment; n=3–4 for control; n=3 for ganitumab). (C) Xenograft lysates were immunoblotted for IGF-1R, INSR, and actin for Control → Control and Control → Ganitumab tumors. Blots were quantified by densitometry and relative IGF-1R (D) and relative INSR (E) normalized to actin are shown. All data are displayed ± SEM. (*p<.05, Two-tailed Student’s t-test)
Figure 4
Figure 4. Ganitumab does not affect the growth of well-established castration-resistant 22Rv1 xenografts
22Rv1 xenografts were established in castrated nude mice. When tumors reached an average volume of 260–320 mm3 treatment with ganitumab or control antibody was initiated. (A) Tumor volumes are shown for ganitumab and control treated mice (n=4–14 for control, n=3–14 for ganitumab). (B) Xenograft lysates were immunoblotted for IGF-1R, INSR, and actin. (C) Blots were quantifed by densitometry and relative IGF-1R levels (C) and relative INSR levels (D) normalized to actin are shown. All data are displayed ± SEM. (*p<.05, Two-tailed Student’s t-test)
Figure 5
Figure 5. Combining ganitumab with androgen-deprivation therapy most effectively inhibits VCaP xenografts
VCaP xenografts were established in intact mice, and mice were castrated when tumors reached an average volume of 260–320 mm3. One week after castration mice were randomized into 2 groups and treatment with ganitumab or control antibody was initiated. (A) Tumor volumes (mm3) are shown relative to time of castration for control and ganitumab treated mice (n=4–14 for control; n=5–16 for ganitumab) (control-treated tumor volumes are those from figure 3a). (B) Weeks observed without recurrences were calculated and are shown above (n=11 for control; n=5 for ganitumab) (C) Serum PSA (ng/mL) is shown (n=3–13 for control; n=5–11 for ganitumab). Relative IGF-1R (D) INSR (E) protein levels detected by MSD multiplex analysis are shown for intact (pre-castrate baseline), control-treated, and ganitumab-treated mice relative to time of castration (n=3~5 per group). All data are displayed ± SEM. (*p<.05, ***<.001, Two-tailed Student’s t-test)
Figure 6
Figure 6. Evaluation of durability and reversibility of combined ganitumab and androgen-deprivation therapy on VCaP xenografts
VCaP xenografts were established in intact mice, and mice were castrated when tumors reached an average volume of 260–320 mm3. Beginning one week after castration mice were treated with ganitumab for four weeks. Mice were randomized into 2 groups and treatment with control antibody was initiated or ganitumab was continued. (A) Discontinuation of ganitumab after 4 weeks (5 weeks post castration) resulted in recurrence of all VCaP tumors (n=4) († – deceased mouse due to causes unrelated to treatment). (B) Long-term treatment with ganitumab resulted in recurrence in 2 of 5 tumors. (Average tumor volume is reflected in figure 5a.) (C) Quantification of recurrence after ganitumab discontinuation (reversibility) and long-term ganitumab treatment (durability) is shown.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Jemal A, Siegel R, Xu J, Ward E. Cancer statistics, 2010. CA Cancer J Clin. 2010;60:277–300. - PubMed
    1. Breuhahn K, Longerich T, Schirmacher P. Dysregulation of growth factor signaling in human hepatocellular carcinoma. Oncogene. 2006;25:3787–800. - PubMed
    1. Mendivil A, Zhou C, Cantrell LA, Gehrig PA, Malloy KM, Blok LJ, et al. AMG 479, a novel IGF-1-R antibody, inhibits endometrial cancer cell proliferation through disruption of the PI3K/Akt and MAPK pathways. Reprod Sci. 2011;18:832–41. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Grothey A, Voigt W, Schober C, Muller T, Dempke W, Schmoll HJ. The role of insulin-like growth factor I and its receptor in cell growth, transformation, apoptosis, and chemoresistance in solid tumors. J Cancer Res Clin Oncol. 1999;125:166–73. - PubMed
    1. Beltran PJ, Chung YA, Moody G, Mitchell P, Cajulis E, Vonderfecht S, et al. Efficacy of ganitumab (AMG 479), alone and in combination with rapamycin, in Ewing’s and osteogenic sarcoma models. J Pharmacol Exp Ther. 2011;337:644–54. - PubMed

Publication types

MeSH terms