Results of endoscopic endonasal dacryocystorhinostomy
- PMID: 23348318
- PMCID: PMC3556382
- DOI: 10.1097/SCS.0b013e3182668971
Results of endoscopic endonasal dacryocystorhinostomy
Abstract
Nasolacrimal ductus obstruction cause Epifora. Two widely accepted treatment modalities are external and endoscopic dacryocystorhinostomy. Currently available rigid nasal endoscopes are safe for intranasal manipulation of structures of the nasal cavity, including the region of the lacrimal sac. Twenty-eight patients with complete stenosis of the nasolacrimal duct were treated with endoscopically controlled endonasal dacryocystorhinoslomy. Approximately 97% of the patients were symptom free, and 3% of these felt improved postoperatively. This procedure appears to be safe and effective, which should be considered as an alternative to external dacryocystorhinostomy for the surgical treatment of the nasolacrimal duct obstruction.
Conflict of interest statement
We have no conflict of interest that we should disclose
Comment in
-
Endoscopic endonasal dacryocystorhinostomy.J Craniofac Surg. 2014;25(2):717-8. doi: 10.1097/01.scs.0000436680.97314.50. J Craniofac Surg. 2014. PMID: 24621742 No abstract available.
References
-
- Caldwell Gw. A new operation fort he radical cure of obstruction of the nasal duct. N Y Med. 1893;58:476.
-
- Mosher Hp. Mosher-Toti operation on the lacrimal sac. Laryngoscope. 1921;31:284.
-
- Rice Dh. A cadaver study. Am J Rhinol. 1988;2:127–8.
-
- Mcdonogh M, Meiring Jh. Endoscopic transnasal dacryocystorhinostomy. J Laryngol Otol. 1989;103:585–7. - PubMed
-
- Ben Simon Gj, Joseph J, Lee S, et al. External versus endoscopic dacryocystorhinostomy for acquired nasolacrimal duct obstruction in a tertiary referral center. Ophthalmology. 2005;112:1463–8. - PubMed
MeSH terms
Grants and funding
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources
Medical
