Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2012:2:73.
doi: 10.4103/2156-7514.104306. Epub 2012 Dec 4.

Computed tomography mimics of acute appendicitis: predictors of appendiceal disease confirmed at pathology

Affiliations

Computed tomography mimics of acute appendicitis: predictors of appendiceal disease confirmed at pathology

Jeremy B Duda et al. J Clin Imaging Sci. 2012.

Abstract

Purpose: Imaging and pathology findings are used to analyze the capability of computed tomography (CT) to distinguish between acute appendicitis and radiological mimickers.

Materials and methods: A retrospective review of 5861 patients undergoing abdominopelvic CT from 2000 to 2008 for suspicion of acute appendicitis was performed. Appendix diameter, surrounding inflammation, appendicolith, and location were assessed. Only those cases were included where patients underwent surgery for acute appendicitis on CT findings. Pathology specimens were examined and those indicative of acute appendicitis were identified. Statistical analysis was performed to correlate pathology and CT signs.

Results: A total of 969 of the 5681 patients were included in the study. Acute appendicitis was verified in 870/969 (89%) cases, while 99/969 (11%) demonstrated either chronic findings (i.e., fibrosis [32%], granulomatous disease [16%], lymphoid hyperplasia [11%]) or no abnormality. In regression models, appendiceal diameter >7 mm (odds ratio [OR] = 3.98, P < 0.0001) and mesenteric fat stranding (OR = 6.04, P < 0.0001) were associated with acute appendicitis. Nearly 87% (754/870) of acute appendicitis cases showed both signs on CT, compared with 53% (52/99) of those with other pathologic finding (P < 0.0001). In cases with non-appendicitis findings, 39% (39/99) had only one of these signs compared with 13% (112/870) of those with acute appendicitis (P < 0.0001).

Conclusion: Diseases of the appendix other than acute appendicitis may manifest with isolated radiological findings and should be considered as part of the differential diagnosis in cases of borderline acute appendicitis.

Keywords: Abdominal radiology; appendicitis; computed tomography.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Conflict of Interest: None declared.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Mucocele of the appendix. Axial computed tomography image through the pelvis shows an enlarged tubular structure in the right lower quadrant without significant adjacent inflammatory change (arrow). Note the bubbly appearance of the luminal contents.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Carcinoma of the appendix. Axial computed tomography image through the right lower quadrant demonstrates a homogenously thickened appendix with minimal surrounding fat stranding (arrow) exerting mass effect upon adjacent contrast-filled small bowel.
Figure 3
Figure 3
Endometriosis involving the appendix. Axial computed tomography image through the upper pelvis shows a thickened appendix with hazy borders (arrow) and surrounding mild infiltrative changes in the mesenteric fat.

References

    1. Livingston EH, Woodward WA, Sarosi GA, Haley RW. Disconnect between incidence of nonperforated and perforated appendicitis: Implications for pathophysiology and Management. Ann Surg. 2007;245:886–92. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Lane MJ, Liu DM, Huynh MD, Jeffrey RB, Jr, Mindelzun RE, Katz DS. Suspected acute appendicitis: nonenhanced helical CT in 300 consecutive patients. Radiology. 1999;213:341–6. - PubMed
    1. Choi YH, Fischer E, Hoda SA, Rubenstein WA, Morrissey KP, Hertford D, et al. Appendiceal CT in 140 cases: Diagnostic criteria for acute and necrotizing appendicitis. Clin Imaging. 1998;22:252–71. - PubMed
    1. Raja AS, Wright C, Sodickson AD, Zane RD, Schiff GD, Hanson R, et al. Negative appendectomy in the era of CT: An 18 year perspective. Radiology. 2010;256:460–5. - PubMed
    1. Bendeck SE, Nino-Murcia M, Berry GJ, Jeffery RB. Imaging for suspected appendicitis: Negative appendectomy and perforation rates. Radiology. 2002;225:131–6. - PubMed