Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2013 Jul-Aug;20(4):766-77.
doi: 10.1136/amiajnl-2012-001160. Epub 2013 Jan 25.

The intended and unintended consequences of communication systems on general internal medicine inpatient care delivery: a prospective observational case study of five teaching hospitals

Affiliations

The intended and unintended consequences of communication systems on general internal medicine inpatient care delivery: a prospective observational case study of five teaching hospitals

Robert C Wu et al. J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2013 Jul-Aug.

Abstract

Background: Effective clinical communication is critical to providing high-quality patient care. Hospitals have used different types of interventions to improve communication between care teams, but there have been few studies of their effectiveness.

Objectives: To describe the effects of different communication interventions and their problems.

Design: Prospective observational case study using a mixed methods approach of quantitative and qualitative methods.

Setting: General internal medicine (GIM) inpatient wards at five tertiary care academic teaching hospitals.

Participants: Clinicians consisting of residents, attending physicians, nurses, and allied health (AH) staff working on the GIM wards.

Methods: Ethnographic methods and interviews with clinical staff (doctors, nurses, medical students, and AH professionals) were conducted over a 16-month period from 2009 to 2010.

Results: We identified four categories that described the intended and unintended consequences of communication interventions: impacts on senders, receivers, interprofessional collaboration, and the use of informal communication processes. The use of alphanumeric pagers, smartphones, and web-based communication systems had positive effects for senders and receivers, but unintended consequences were seen with all interventions in all four categories.

Conclusions: Interventions that aimed to improve clinical communications solved some but not all problems, and unintended effects were seen with all systems.

Keywords: Evaluation; Hospital communication; Intended and unintended consequences; Knowledge transfer; smartphones.

PubMed Disclaimer

References

    1. Coiera E. When conversation is better than computation. J Am Med Inform Assoc 2000;7:277–86 - PMC - PubMed
    1. Brennan TA, Leape LL, Laird NM, et al. Incidence of adverse events and negligence in hospitalized patients. Results of the Harvard Medical Practice Study I. N Engl J Med 1991;324:370–6 - PubMed
    1. Wilson RM, Runciman WB, Gibberd RW, et al. The quality in Australian Health Care Study. Med J Aust 1995;163:458–71 - PubMed
    1. Woods DM, Holl JL, Angst DB, et al. Gaps in pediatric clinician communication and opportunities for improvement. J Healthc Qual 2008;30:43–54 - PubMed
    1. Wilson RM, Runciman WB, Gibberd RW, et al. Quality in Australian Health Care Study. Med J Aust 1996;164:754. - PubMed

Publication types