Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Multicenter Study
. 2013 Jul-Aug;20(4):718-26.
doi: 10.1136/amiajnl-2012-000946. Epub 2013 Jan 25.

Computerized provider documentation: findings and implications of a multisite study of clinicians and administrators

Affiliations
Multicenter Study

Computerized provider documentation: findings and implications of a multisite study of clinicians and administrators

Peter J Embi et al. J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2013 Jul-Aug.

Abstract

Objective: Clinical documentation is central to the medical record and so to a range of healthcare and business processes. As electronic health record adoption expands, computerized provider documentation (CPD) is increasingly the primary means of capturing clinical documentation. Previous CPD studies have focused on particular stakeholder groups and sites, often limiting their scope and conclusions. To address this, we studied multiple stakeholder groups from multiple sites across the USA.

Methods: We conducted 14 focus groups at five Department of Veterans Affairs facilities with 129 participants (54 physicians or practitioners, 34 nurses, and 37 administrators). Investigators qualitatively analyzed resultant transcripts, developed categories linked to the data, and identified emergent themes.

Results: Five major themes related to CPD emerged: communication and coordination; control and limitations in expressivity; information availability and reasoning support; workflow alteration and disruption; and trust and confidence concerns. The results highlight that documentation intertwines tightly with clinical and administrative workflow. Perceptions differed between the three stakeholder groups but remained consistent within groups across facilities.

Conclusions: CPD has dramatically changed documentation processes, impacting clinical understanding, decision-making, and communication across multiple groups. The need for easy and rapid, yet structured and constrained, documentation often conflicts with the need for highly reliable and retrievable information to support clinical reasoning and workflows. Current CPD systems, while better than paper overall, often do not meet the needs of users, partly because they are based on an outdated 'paper-chart' paradigm. These findings should inform those implementing CPD systems now and future plans for more effective CPD systems.

Keywords: Clinical Documentation; Electronic Health Records; Medical Informatics; Professional Communication; Qualitative Research.

PubMed Disclaimer

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Blumenthal D. Launching HITECH. N Engl J Med 2010;362:382–5 - PubMed
    1. Buntin MB, Jain SH, Blumenthal D. Health information technology: laying the infrastructure for national health reform. Health Aff (Millwood) 2010;29:1214–19 - PubMed
    1. Reiser SJ. The clinical record in medicine. Part 1: learning from cases. Ann Intern Med 1991;114:902–7 - PubMed
    1. Weed LL. Medical records that guide and teach. N Engl J Med 1968;278:593–600 - PubMed
    1. Massaro TA. Introducing physician order entry at a major academic medical center: II. Impact on medical education. Acad Med 1993;68:25–30 - PubMed

Publication types

MeSH terms